Legislate Enact LOKPAL Bill
S.O.S e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web
Working For The Rights
& Survival Of The Oppressed
Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R… VOL.6
issue.31…… 01/08/2012
Government Inaction on Irom Sharmila's Fast Is An Affront To Democracy
An Open
Letter to Honourable Chief Justice of India
To,
Honourable Chief
Justice of India ,
Supreme
Court of India ,
New Delhi.
Kind Attn: Sh. S. H. Kapadia
Dear Sir,
We are
writing this letter to you with my faith in judiciary and deep pain in my
heart. The pain is there because as a citizen of this democracy, we would
like to have every right to be heard and to raise our voice.
By this public letter, we want to raise our voice before
you (before the highest institution of law in my country) as the
issue about which we are requesting, is associated with the interest
of public by and large and thus your intervention will be helpful in
protection of law as well as in establishing and maintaining our faith in
constitution and its values.
We are talking about Irom Sharmila, a lady who is domicile of
Manipur and who is observing a hunger protest since last 11 years (since the
year 2000). The objective is to register the grievance against human rights
violations in Manipur and the demand is to repeal the AFSPA (Armed forces
special power act).
The lady has every right to register and to protest as she is
associated with the people of Manipur who faced the ill effects of this
draconian law. However, through this letter, we would like to make it
clear that like in every other such protests, government always try to come
with solution including visits, negotiation, reviews, public debates and hearings,
referendum etc; however in this case/demand, no such steps have been taken from
the side of government yet.
It has also to be noted that some human rights activists have
submitted petitions before NHRC (National Human Rights Commission) , but NHRC
disposed off almost all such petitions and replies that the matter is
political.
We, the citizens of India, who understand the issue, may be
divided in two parts , one is the indians who support AFSPA, another is the
indians who oppose AFSPA. But still, both of these categories supports
Irom Sharmila on democratic and humanitarian grounds and criticize government/
courts/ NHRC because no concrete steps have been taken by such responsible
agencies/institutions.
I believe that the ongoing fast of Irom Sharmila is the
symbol of her faith in democratic values and non violence. The fact that the
Government has not taken any positive steps also hurts us and our faith in
democracy.
We would like to bring to your kind attention these facts:
· She is a
human rights activist and has been fighting not for the cause of one individual
or herself, but for the
society as a whole . The charge of “ attempt to suicide ” is disgraceful. · She is
charged under “ attempt to suicide ” and facing 'arrest' for this attempt.
Every time she move to court and repeat her statement for not to break her fast
and her arrest extended. Is it right to provide order of 'arrest' for
the same charge repeatedly?
· Sharmila's
fight is based on non violence. She talks about peace, love and non violence in
her each message. But the Government has ignored her. In these 11 years, no
parliamentary delegation or all-party representative group was ever sent to
Manipur. There hasn't even been any continuous approach of communication.
· NHRC has also not
arranged any official visit of members of this institution to meet Irom
Sharmila and
people of Manipur.
· The meeting
procedure is also very difficult. It is, unlike, as in all other cases of
suicide attempt or as in case of an ordinary prisoner. She
has been charged under the attempt to suicide but doesn't forced solitary
confinement increase the chances of suicide?
· She is not
allowed to meet the public .
When other prisoners charged with the same or more serious charge are allowed,
then why not her? It violates the Right to equality before law. is it not
violating Article 19 under which she has right to freedom of speech, peaceful
assembly, move freely.
· The
suppression of a non-violent voice may discourage people from using this method
of protest and will encourage violent ways.
· It has
been seen that government has a practice to make efforts for negotiation and to
take action and to initiate a process when any such fast has been organized in
New Delhi in past, however government has not approached to Irom in spite of
her 11 years long fast. Is it not the violation of right where it is told
that 'The state shall not discriminate against any citizen on the basis
of caste, religion, race , place of birth etc'
· Many
national/international agencies, eminent persons like Nobel peace prize
winners, Padma awardees, Magsaysay awardees, many social activists and
intellectuals and general public have been raising this issue. In view of this
suppression by the Government, and the necessity to protect the values of
humanity and democracy, I request here to you (Chief Justice, Supreme Court of
India) for protection of human rights.
The issue has not only appealed to the general public but has
become known on an international scale as well. I request you
· To
issue notice to the Government of India on the issue
· To constitute a committee of
retired/sitting judge, human rights activists, parliamentrians
to submit reports on this issue and
review condition
· To make Irom Sharmila free
· To
advise NHRC to arrange an official visit of members of NHRC at Manipur to meet
Irom Sharmila
We hope that our faith in this institution will be maintained by
the actions of the institution in favor of protection of human rights in this
case.
Your’s
sincerely,
Nagaraja.M.R.
Editorial
: Enact JANLOKPAL - An
Appeal to Honourable Prime
Minister of India , GOI
We have suffered enough due to corruption. We are deeply hurt and disappointed with any lack of a real and meaningful solution from you and your government. The Parliament session meant for passing Lokpal Bill was wasted by Unparliamentary behaviour of some MPs.
We want change, and we want accountability and we cannot wait any longer to have this! We will not vote for you if an effective anti-corruption bill is not enacted. Not the farce Lokpal Bill proposed by your government, but the peoples “Jan Lokpal Bill” which is more stringent than the ones proposed by GOI & Team Anna. We want strict and effective punishment for the corrupt. They MUST go to jail! Or you Mr. PM, along with your party, will fall from the people’s grace. We assure you, stand by us, and we will stand by you. The opposite will also hold true.
Your government has appointed a GoM to draft the Lokpal Bill. This GoM includes -
Sharad Pawar,Veerapa Moily and Kapil Sibal. Mr. Pawar and Mr. Moily have a past of allegations of corruption and mis-deeds that the entire country is aware of. Mr. Sibal does not feel there was corruption in the 2G scam. Having these people draft the anti-corruption law – is it not an insult to the people of India? How can the corrupt be asked to draft an anti-corruption bill? We urge you to consider the choice put forth by the people – credible names such as Justice Santosh Hegde, Prashant Bhushan, Shanti Bushan and others, to be part of the committee to draft the Lokpal Bill. Just look at the draft proposed by GOI , it has left out many public servants and tax evading corporate , industrialists (who are the origin & source of black money corruption) from lokpal ambit , only good thing is NGOs are included.
Shri Anna Hazare, one of the Greatest Social Reformers India has ever seen has demanded for a Lokpal which has the power to investigate & prosecute all public servants from peon to Supreme Court Judges , president of india. We urge you to immediately accept the demands of the people of India represented by the demands of Shri Anna Hazare lest the discontent among the people grows out of control.
The sentiments against rampant corruption in this country are quickly becoming as strong as those that led to the uprising in Tahrir Square. The honest and hardworking people of this country refuse to be innocent bystanders in the wholesale public looting that is taking place as you read this letter. We request your immediate and strong response to this concern of the people as corruption should be the top priority of your government. If the challenge is not met effectively and promptly, it has the potential of undermining every valuable effort made by upright citizens of this country over the last century - including you. It also has the potential of leaving your government with a legacy of shame.
Tahrir square can yet be a reality in India.
We trust you will take immediate steps to give us our solution, and not force us to take the above steps! Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
We have suffered enough due to corruption. We are deeply hurt and disappointed with any lack of a real and meaningful solution from you and your government. The Parliament session meant for passing Lokpal Bill was wasted by Unparliamentary behaviour of some MPs.
We want change, and we want accountability and we cannot wait any longer to have this! We will not vote for you if an effective anti-corruption bill is not enacted. Not the farce Lokpal Bill proposed by your government, but the peoples “Jan Lokpal Bill” which is more stringent than the ones proposed by GOI & Team Anna. We want strict and effective punishment for the corrupt. They MUST go to jail! Or you Mr. PM, along with your party, will fall from the people’s grace. We assure you, stand by us, and we will stand by you. The opposite will also hold true.
Your government has appointed a GoM to draft the Lokpal Bill. This GoM includes -
Sharad Pawar,Veerapa Moily and Kapil Sibal. Mr. Pawar and Mr. Moily have a past of allegations of corruption and mis-deeds that the entire country is aware of. Mr. Sibal does not feel there was corruption in the 2G scam. Having these people draft the anti-corruption law – is it not an insult to the people of India? How can the corrupt be asked to draft an anti-corruption bill? We urge you to consider the choice put forth by the people – credible names such as Justice Santosh Hegde, Prashant Bhushan, Shanti Bushan and others, to be part of the committee to draft the Lokpal Bill. Just look at the draft proposed by GOI , it has left out many public servants and tax evading corporate , industrialists (who are the origin & source of black money corruption) from lokpal ambit , only good thing is NGOs are included.
Shri Anna Hazare, one of the Greatest Social Reformers India has ever seen has demanded for a Lokpal which has the power to investigate & prosecute all public servants from peon to Supreme Court Judges , president of india. We urge you to immediately accept the demands of the people of India represented by the demands of Shri Anna Hazare lest the discontent among the people grows out of control.
The sentiments against rampant corruption in this country are quickly becoming as strong as those that led to the uprising in Tahrir Square. The honest and hardworking people of this country refuse to be innocent bystanders in the wholesale public looting that is taking place as you read this letter. We request your immediate and strong response to this concern of the people as corruption should be the top priority of your government. If the challenge is not met effectively and promptly, it has the potential of undermining every valuable effort made by upright citizens of this country over the last century - including you. It also has the potential of leaving your government with a legacy of shame.
Tahrir square can yet be a reality in India.
We trust you will take immediate steps to give us our solution, and not force us to take the above steps! Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Nagaraja.M.R.
The Jan Lokpal Bill (Citizen's ombudsman Bill) is a draft
anti-corruption bill drawn up by prominent civil society activists seeking the
appointment of a Jan Lokpal, an independent body that would investigate
corruption cases, complete the investigation within a year and envisages trial
in the case getting over in the next one year.
Drafted by Justice Santosh Hegde (former Supreme Court Judge
and former Lokayukta of Karnataka), Prashant Bhushan (Supreme Court Lawyer) and
Arvind Kejriwal (RTI activist), the draft Bill envisages a system where a
corrupt person found guilty would go to jail within two years of the complaint
being made and his ill-gotten wealth being confiscated. It also seeks power to
the Jan Lokpal to prosecute politicians and bureaucrats without government
permission.
Retired IPS officer Kiran Bedi and other known people like
Swami Agnivesh, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Anna Hazare and Mallika Sarabhai are also
part of the movement, called India Against Corruption. Its website describes
the movement as "an expression of collective anger of people of India
against corruption. We have all come together to
force/request/persuade/pressurize the Government to enact the Jan Lokpal Bill.
We feel that if this Bill were enacted it would create an effective deterrence
against corruption."
Anna Hazare, anti-corruption crusader, went on a
fast-unto-death in April, demanding that this Bill, drafted by the civil
society, be adopted. Four days into his fast, the government agreed to set up a
joint committee with an equal number of members from the government and civil
society side to draft the Lokpal Bill together. The two sides met several times
but could not agree on fundamental elements like including the PM under the
purview of the Lokpal. Eventually, both sides drafted their own version of the
Bill.
The government has introduced its version in Parliament in
this session. Team Anna is up in arms and calls the government version the
"Joke Pal Bill." Anna Hazare declared that he would begin another
fast in Delhi on August 16. Hours before he was to begin his hunger strike, the
Delhi Police detained and later arrested him. There are widespread protests all
over the country against his arrest.
The website of the India Against Corruption movement calls
the Lokpal Bill of the government an "eyewash" and has on it a
critique of that government Bill.
A look at the salient features of Jan Lokpal Bill:
A look at the salient features of Jan Lokpal Bill:
1. An institution called LOKPAL at the centre and LOKAYUKTA
in each state will be set up
2. Like Supreme Court and Election Commission, they will be
completely independent of the governments. No minister or bureaucrat will be
able to influence their investigations.
3. Cases against corrupt people will not linger on for years
anymore: Investigations in any case will have to be completed in one year.
Trial should be completed in next one year so that the corrupt politician,
officer or judge is sent to jail within two years.
4. The loss that a corrupt person caused to the government
will be recovered at the time of conviction.
5. How will it help a common citizen: If any work of any
citizen is not done in prescribed time in any government office, Lokpal will
impose financial penalty on guilty officers, which will be given as
compensation to the complainant.
6. So, you could approach Lokpal if your ration card or
passport or voter card is not being made or if police is not registering your
case or any other work is not being done in prescribed time. Lokpal will have
to get it done in a month's time. You could also report any case of corruption
to Lokpal like ration being siphoned off, poor quality roads been constructed
or panchayat funds being siphoned off. Lokpal will have to complete its investigations
in a year, trial will be over in next one year and the guilty will go to jail
within two years.
7. But won't the government appoint corrupt and weak people
as Lokpal members? That won't be possible because its members will be selected
by judges, citizens and constitutional authorities and not by politicians,
through a completely transparent and participatory process.
8. What if some officer in Lokpal becomes corrupt? The
entire functioning of Lokpal/ Lokayukta will be completely transparent. Any
complaint against any officer of Lokpal shall be investigated and the officer
dismissed within two months.
9. What will happen to existing anti-corruption agencies?
CVC, departmental vigilance and anti-corruption branch of CBI will be merged
into Lokpal. Lokpal will have complete powers and machinery to independently
investigate and prosecute any officer, judge or politician.
10. It will be the duty of the Lokpal to provide protection
to those who are being victimized for raising their voice against corruption.
Jan Lokpal Bill will improve existing anti-corruption systems.
Existing System
|
System Proposed by civil society
|
No politician or senior officer ever goes to jail
despite huge evidence because Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) and CBI
directly come under the government. Before starting investigation or
initiating prosecution in any case, they have to take permission from the
same bosses, against whom the case has to be investigated.
|
Lokpal at centre and Lokayukta at state level will be
independent bodies. ACB and CBI will be merged into these bodies. They will
have power to initiate investigations and prosecution against any officer or
politician without needing anyone’s permission. Investigation should be
completed within 1 year and trial to get over in next 1 year. Within two
years, the corrupt should go to jail.
|
No corrupt officer is dismissed from the jobbecause
Central Vigilance Commission, which is supposed to dismiss corrupt officers,
is only an advisory body. Whenever it advises government to dismiss any
senior corrupt officer, its advice is never implemented.
|
Lokpal and Lokayukta will have complete powers to
order dismissal of a corrupt officer. CVC and all departmental vigilance
will be merged into Lokpal and state vigilance will be merged into Lokayukta.
|
No action is taken against corrupt judgesbecause
permission is required from the Chief Justice of India to even register an
FIR against corrupt judges.
|
Lokpal & Lokayukta shall have powers to
investigate and prosecute any judge without needing anyone’s permission.
|
Nowhere to go - People expose corruption but no
action is taken on their complaints.
|
Lokpal & Lokayukta will have to enquire into
and hear every complaint.
|
There is so much corruption within CBI and vigilance
departments. Their functioning is so secret that it encourages corruption
within these agencies.
|
All investigations in Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be
transparent. After completion of investigation, all case records shall
be open to public. Complaint against any staff of Lokpal & Lokayukta
shall be enquired and punishment announced within two months.
|
Weak and corrupt people are appointed as heads of
anti-corruption agencies.
|
Politicians will have absolutely no say in
selections of Chairperson and members of Lokpal & Lokayukta.
Selections will take place through a transparent and public participatory
process.
|
Citizens face harassment in government offices.
Sometimes they are forced to pay bribes. One can only complaint to senior
officers. No action is taken on complaints because senior officers also get
their cut.
|
Lokpal & Lokayukta will get public grievances
resolved in time bound manner, impose a penalty of Rs 250 per day of delay to
be deducted from the salary of guilty officer and award that amount as
compensation to the aggrieved citizen.
|
Nothing in law to recover ill gotten wealth.A corrupt
person can come out of jail and enjoy that money.
|
Loss caused to the government due to corruptionwill
be recovered from all accused.
|
Small punishment for corruption- Punishment for
corruption is minimum 6 months and maximum 7 years.
|
Enhanced punishment - The punishment would be
minimum 5 years and maximum of life imprisonment.
|
Salient features of Jan Lokpal Bill
•
An institution called LOKPAL at the centre and LOKAYUKTA in each state will be
set up
•
Like Supreme Court and Election Commission, they will be completely independent
of the governments. No minister or bureaucrat will be able to influence their
investigations.
•
Cases against corrupt people will not linger on for years anymore:
Investigations in any case will have to be completed in one year. Trial should
be completed in next one year so that the corrupt politician, officer or judge
is sent to jail within two years.
•
The loss that a corrupt person caused to the government will be recovered at
the time of conviction.
•
How will it help a common citizen: If any work of any citizen is not done in
prescribed time in any government office, Lokpal will impose financial penalty
on guilty officers, which will be given as compensation to the complainant.
•
So, you could approach Lokpal if your ration card or passport or voter card is
not being made or if police is not registering your case or any other work is
not being done in prescribed time. Lokpal will have to get it done in a month’s
time. You could also report any case of corruption to Lokpal like ration being
siphoned off, poor quality roads been constructed or panchayat funds being
siphoned off. Lokpal will have to complete its investigations in a year, trial
will be over in next one year and the guilty will go to jail within two years.
•
But won’t the government appoint corrupt and weak people as Lokpal members?
That won’t be possible because its members will be selected by judges, citizens
and constitutional authorities and not by politicians, through a completely
transparent and participatory process.
•
What if some officer in Lokpal becomes corrupt? The entire functioning of
Lokpal/ Lokayukta will be completely transparent. Any complaint against any
officer of Lokpal shall be investigated and the officer dismissed within two
months.
•
What will happen to existing anti-corruption agencies? CVC, departmental
vigilance and anti-corruption branch of CBI will be merged into Lokpal. Lokpal
will have complete powers and machinery to independently investigate and
prosecute any officer, judge or politician.
•
It will be the duty of the Lokpal to provide protection to those who are being
victimized for raising their voice against corruption.
Mr.Arvind Kejriwal & Mr.Winston Churchill are Almost RIGHT
- Criminals have entered Indian
Parliament
- Legislate LOKPAL Bill
With whole hearted respects to the
parliament & all constitutional bodies , hereby we are appealing to the
honest few in public service , honest few in parliament , honest few in
judiciary & honest few in police , to legally prosecute their corrupt
colleagues , to legislate “ LOKPAL BILL” with full
powers to enforce accountability of all public servants , MPs , MLAs ,
Police , etc to the citizens of india. Contempt of Parliament & other
constitutional bodies is being made by some of the Corrupt MPs themselves.
Therby these MPs are making contempt of Indian Parliament , 105 crore Indian
citizens , Constitution of India and Obstructing the Indian Citizens from
performing their FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to uphold constituion of india , it's
dignity. These Corrupt Public Servants are doing more damges to India's
National Unity & Integrity than naxals & terrorists . These Corrupt
Public Servants are more deadlier & greater threat to india than Pakistan
& China. The honest few in parliament & other constitutional
bodies are either keeping mum or not taking appropriate steps to intiate
criminal legal prosecution against their corrupt colleagues , this is aiding
those criminals to do more crimes , to go unpunished , to manipulate legal
system , to manipulate evidences / records , to get acquitted by courts for
lack of evidences , to influence police to withdraw cases against them or to
file B reports , etc. In these ways the corrupt public servants will never
be convicted , they will be either stay as accussed or acquitted for lack
of evidences or government withdraws cases against them or police file B
report.
Citizens of india are supreme in democratic
republic of india. parliament , MPs , MLAs are creations of citizens and are
subservient , subordinate to the citizens of india. Creations cann’t be supreme
than the creator.
Vohra committee has officially
acknowledged the criminalization of politics , parliament , legislatures. The
politicians crave for power because , while in power investigating /
prosecuting agencies will be under their control / influence and they can
manipulate the legal process , WHITE WASHING all their crimes. Just see ,
recently union home minister Mr.Chidambaram influencing the delhi
police for closing a cheating case against a builder by forcing the
police to file “B” report. Politicians stoop low to such levels , to make money
Ex : irregularities in purchase of coffins meant for kargil martyrs ,
allotment of flats meant for war widows , war veterans at Mumbai.
If proper accountability of public
servants is legally enacted, independence , autonomy of judiciary & police
is legally enacted , then those in power cann’t WHITE WASH their own
crimes. That is the reason many political parties are opposing “LOKPAL BILL”
since decades under many pretexts.
Subject to conditions , I do offer my
services to the government of india & supreme court of india , to legally
apprehend CRIMINALS , CORRUPT PUBLIC SERVANTS , ARE
YOU READY ?
JANLOKPAL BILL - Need for Accountability of VVIPS
While drafting our
constitution of india , drafting members - freedom fighters themselves assumed
that in future also the persons who will occupy constituional
positions will be sincere & of high impeccable integrity. However they were proved wrong. Late Prime Minister of
Great Britain Mr.Winston Churchill has been proved right.
"Power will go to the hands of
rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre
and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They
will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles .
A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston
made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of
India & Pakistan.
Nowadays ,
criminals have entered into public service , working as police ,
magistrates , etc. Criminals have become MPs , MLAs and are also working as
Cabinet Ministers . Criminals have become judges , some of them have become supreme
court judges.
End result CRIMINALS POLICING THE OTHER
CRIMINALS , CRIMINALS DRAFTING LAWS , CRIMINALS JUDGING OTHERS.
Even there are cases of irregularities , illegaliteies by Prime Minister of India and Irregularities , illegalities committed by supreme court of india judges . Example : JMM MPs bribery
case , CWG Scam , 2G Scam , Bofors Scandal , etc and Bhopal Gas Tragedy Judgement fixing by then chief
justice of india by way of alteration of charges , financial irregularities , illegal dealings by supreme court
judges , etc.
In this backdrop , continuing with
legal immunity to Prime minister of india , supreme court judges or any constitutional
persons is nothing but blanket clearance to those VVIPs to commit more crimes , more anti-national acts wthout the fear
of Law or Legal Prosecution. THIS LEGAL IMMUNITY IS & WILL BE AGAINST THE BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL
LETTER & SPIRIT OF EQUALITY & EQUITABLE JUSTICE.
Are not some of the cabinet minsiters , so
called constitutional experts , great advocates aware of this fundamental violation of constitution of india. Ofcourse , these
advocates rightly fight for , take the cases of poor , commonman , they usually
take cases of MNCs , Big time criminals , etc. Let these constitutional experts show us a single government hospital
without corruption . Let the light of our constitution shine on our learned friends in the parliament belonging to all
political parties. Corruption is there in every political party , in the same
way there are very few honest persons in all political parties , judiciary
, police & public service. Why you are afraid of accountability to people , while you are enjoying
5-star luxurious lifestyles at tax payer’s expense ?
If you are so sincere READ ARTICLES / CASE at following web pages & ANSWER :
Judgements for SALE in India
Cross Examination of Loksabha Speaker
& RajyaSabha Dy Chairman
Parliamentary Privilege or Cover-up of
Crimes
Threats to RTI Applicant &
Judgement Fixing
Honour of Indian Parliament for SALE
JANLOKPAL BILL
Jan Lokpal Bill version 1.8
An act to create effective
anti-corruption and grievance redressal systems at centre so that effective
deterrent is created against corruption
and to provide effective protection to whistleblowers.
1. Short title and commencement:- (1) This Act may be
called the Anti-Corruption, Grievance
Redressal And Whistleblower Protection Act,
2010.
(2) It shall come into force on the one
hundred and twentieth day of its enactment.
2. Definitions:- In this Act, unless
the context otherwise requires,-
(1) “Action” means any action taken by
a public servant in the discharge of his functions as such public
servant and includes decision,
recommendation or finding or in any other manner and includes
willful failure or omission to act and
all other expressions relating to such action shall be construed
accordingly;
(2) “Allegation” in relation to a
public servant includes any affirmation that such public servant-
(a) has indulged in misconduct, if he
is a government servant;
(b) has indulged in corruption
(3) “complaint” includes any grievance
or allegation or a request by whistleblower for protection and
appropriate action.
(4) “corruption” includes anything made
punishable under Chapter IX of the Indian Penal Code or
under the Prevention of Corruption Act,
1988;
Provided that if any person obtains any
benefit from the government by violating any laws or rules,
that person along with the public
servants who directly or indirectly helped that person obtain
those benefits, shall be deemed to have
indulged in corruption.
(5) “Government” or “Central
Government” means Government of India.
(6) “Government Servant” means any
person who is or was any time appointed to a civil service or post
in connection with the affairs of the
Central Government or High Courts or Supreme Court either on
deputation or permanent or temporary or
on contractual employment but would not include the
judges.
(7) “grievance” means a claim by a
person that he sustained injustice or undue hardship in
consequence of mal-administration;
(8) “Lokpal” means
a. Benches constituted under this Act
and performing their functions as laid down under
various provisions of this Act; or
b. Any officer or employee, exercising
its powers and carrying out its functions and
responsibilities, in the manner and to
the extent, assigned to it under this Act, or under
various rules, regulations or orders made
under various provisions of this Act.
c. For all other purposes, the
Chairperson and members acting collectively as a body;
(9) “Mal-administration” means action
taken or purporting to have been taken in the exercise of
administrative function in any case
where,-
a. such action or the administrative
procedure or practice governing such action is
unreasonable, unjust, oppressive or
improperly discriminatory; or
b. there has been willful negligence or
undue delay in taking such action or the administrative
procedure or practice governing such
action involves undue delay;
(10)“Misconduct” means misconduct as
defined in CCS Conduct Rules and which has vigilance angle.
(11)"public authority" means
any authority or body or institution of self- government established or
constituted—
a. by or under the Constitution;
b. by any other law made by Parliament;
c. by notification issued or order made
by the Government, and includes any body owned,
controlled or substantially financed by
the Government;
(12)“Public servant” means a person who
is or was at any time,-
(a) the Prime Minister;
(b) a Minister;
(c) a Member of Parliament;
(d) Judges of High Courts and Supreme
Court;
(e) a Government servant;
(f) the Chairman or Vice-Chairman (by
whatever name called) or a member of a local
authority in the control of the Central
Government or a statutory body or corporation
established by or under any law of the
Parliament of India, including a co-operative
society, or a Government Company within
the meaning of section 617 of the
Companies Act, 1956 and members of any
Committee or Board, statutory or nonstatutory,
constituted by the Government;
(g) Such other authorities as the
Central Government may, by notification, from time to
time, specify;
(13)“Vigilance angle” includes –
(a) All acts of corruption
(b) Gross or willful negligence;
recklessness in decision making; blatant violations of systems and
procedures; exercise of discretion in
excess, where no ostensible/public interest is evident;
failure to keep the controlling authority/superiors
informed in time
(c) Failure/delay in taking action, if
under law the government servant ought to do so, against
subordinates on complaints of
corruption or dereliction of duties or abuse of office by the
subordinates
(d) Indulging in discrimination through
one’s conduct, directly or indirectly.
(e) Victimizing Whistle Blowers
(f) Any undue/unjustified delay in the
disposal of a case, perceived after considering all relevant
factors, would reinforce a conclusion
as to the presence of vigilance angle in a case.
(g) Make unfair investigation or
enquiry to either unduly help culprits or fabricate the innocent.
(h) Any other matter as notified from
time to time by Lokpal
(14)“Whistleblower” is any person who
faces threat of (1) professional harm, including but not limited
to illegitimate transfers, denial of
promotions, denial of appropriate perks, departmental
proceedings, discrimination or (2)
physical harm or (3) is actually subjected to such harm; because
of either making a complaint to Lokpal
under this Act or for filing an application under Right to
Information Act.
3. Establishment of the institution of
Lokpal and appointment of Lokpal:
(1) There shall be an institution known
as Lokpal which shall consist of one Chairperson and ten
members along with its officers and
employees. The Lokpal shall be headed by its Chairperson.
(2) The Chairperson and members of
Lokpal shall be selected in such manner as laid down in this
Act.
(3) A person appointed as Chairperson
or member of Lokpal shall, before entering upon his office,
make and subscribe before the
President, an oath or affirmation in the form as prescribed.
(4) The Government shall appoint the
Chairperson and members of the first Lokpal and set up the
institution with all its logistics and assets
within six months of enactment of this Act.
(5) The Government shall fill up a
vacancy of the Chairperson or a member caused due to
a) Retirement, 3 months before the
member or the Chairperson retires.
b) Any other unforeseen reason, within
a month of such vacancy.
Chairperson and Members of Lokpal
4. The Chairperson and members of
Lokpal not to have held certain offices- The Chairperson and
members of Lokpal shall not be serving
or former member of either the Parliament or the Legislature of
any State and shall not hold any office
or trust of profit (other than the office as Chairperson or
member) or would have ever been
connected with any political party or carry on any business or
practice any profession and
accordingly, before he enters upon his office, a person appointed as the
Chairperson or member of Lokpal shall-
(i) if he holds any office of trust or
profit, resign from such office; or
(ii) if he is carrying on any business,
sever his connection with the conduct and
management of such business; or
(iii) if he is practicing any
profession, suspend practice of such profession.
(iv) If he is associated directly or
indirectly with any other activity, which is likely cause
conflict of interest in the performance
of his duties in Lokpal, he should suspend his
association with that activity.
Provided that if even after the
suspension, the earlier association of that person with
such activity is likely to adversely
affect his performance at Lokpal, that person shall
not be appointed as a member or Chairperson
of Lokpal.
5. Term of office and other conditions
of service of Lokpal– (1) A person appointed as the Chairperson
or member of Lokpal shall hold office
for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his
office;
Provided further that.-
(a) the Chairperson or member of Lokpal
may, by writing under his hand addressed to the
President, resign his office;
(b) the Chairperson or member may be
removed from office in the manner provided in
this Act.
(2) There shall be paid to the
Chairperson and each member every month a salary equal to that of the
Chief Justice of India and that of the
judge of the Supreme Court respectively;
(3) The allowances and pension payable
to and other conditions of service of the Chairperson or a
member shall be such as may be
prescribed;
Provided that the allowances and
pension payable to and other conditions of service of the
Chairperson or members shall not be
varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
(4) The administrative expenses of the
office of the Lokpal including all salaries, allowances and pensions
payable to or in respect of persons
serving in that office, shall be charged on the Consolidated Fund of
India.
(5) There shall be a separate fund by
the name of “Lokpal fund” in which penalties/fines imposed by the
Lokpal shall be deposited and in which
10% of the loss of Public Money detected/prevented on account
of investigations by Lokpal shall also
be deposited by the Government. Disposal of such fund shall be
completely at the discretion of the
Lokpal and such fund shall be used only for
enhancement/upgradation/extension of
the infrastructure of Lokpal.
(6) The Chairperson or members shall
not be eligible for appointment on any position in Government of
India or Government of any state or for
fighting elections, if he has ever held the position of the
Chairperson or a member for any period.
Provided however that a member or
Chairperson may be reappointed for one more term or a member
may be appointed as the Chairperson,
however, that any person shall not serve for more than a total of
two terms.
6. Appointment of the Chairperson and
members:
1. The Chairperson and members shall be
appointed by the President on the recommendation of a
selection committee.
2. Following persons shall not be
eligible to become Chairman or Member in Lokpal:
(a) Any person who was ever
chargesheeted for any offence under IPC or PC Act or was ever
penalized under CCS Conduct Rules.
(b) Any person who is less than 40
years in age.
3. At least four members of Lokpal
shall have legal background.
4. The members and Chairperson should
have unimpeachable integrity and should have
demonstrated their resolve and efforts
to fight against corruption in the past.
5. A selection committee consisting of
the following shall be set up:
a. The Chairpersons of both Houses of
Parliament
b. Two senior most judges of Supreme
Court
c. Two senior most Chief Justices of
High Courts.
d. All Nobel Laureates of Indian Origin
e. Chairperson of National Human Rights
Commission
f. Last two Magsaysay Award winners of
Indian origin
g. Comptroller and Auditor General of
India
h. Chief Election Commissioner
i. Bharat Ratna Award winners
j. After the first set of selection
process, the outgoing members and Chairperson of
Lokpal.
6. The seniormost judge of Supreme Court
shall act as the Chairperson of the selection committee.
7. The following selection process
shall be followed:
a. Recommendations shall be invited
through open advertisements in prescribed format.
b. Each person recommending shall be
expected to justify the selection of his candidate
giving examples from the past
achievements of the candidate.
c. The list of candidates along with
their recommendations received in the format
mentioned above shall be displayed on a
website.
d. Each member of the selection
committee, on the basis of the above material, shall
recommend such number of names as there
are vacancies.
e. A priority list shall be prepared
with the candidate receiving recommendations from
maximum number of members of selection
committee at the top. The candidates
recommended by same number of members
shall be treated at par.
f. This priority list shall be
displayed on the website.
g. Around three times the names as
there are vacancies, shall be shortlisted from the top.
h. Public feedback shall be invited on
the shortlisted names by putting these names on the
website.
i. The selection committee may decide
to use any means to collect more information
about the background and past
achievements of the shortlisted candidates.
j. Selection committee shall invite
shortlisted candidates for discussions, video recordings
of which shall be made public.
k. All the material obtained so far
about the candidates shall be made available to each
member of the selection committee in
advance. The members shall make their own
assessment of each candidate.
l. The selection committee shall meet
and discuss the material so received about each
candidate. The final selections for the
Chairperson and members shall be made
preferably through consensus.
Provided that if three or more members,
for reasons to be recorded in writing, object to
the selection of any member, he shall
not be selected.
m. All meetings of selection committee
shall be video recorded and shall be made public.
8. The Prime Minister shall recommend
the names finalized by the selection committee to the
President immediately, who shall order
such appointments within a month of receipt of the
same.
9. If any of the members of the
selection committee retires while a selection process is going on,
that member will continue on the
selection committee till the end of that process.
7. Removal of Chairperson or members-
(1) The Chairperson or any member shall
not be removed from his office except by an order of the
President.
(2) They can be removed on one or more
of the following grounds:
a. Proved misbehavior
b. Professional or physical incapacity
c. If he is adjudged to be insolvent
d. Has been charged of an offence which
involves moral turpitude
e. If he engages during his term of
office in any paid employment outside the duties of his
office
f. Has acquired such financial
interests or other interests which are likely to affect
prejudicially his functions as member
or Chairperson.
g. If he is guided by considerations
extraneous to the merits of the case either to favor
someone or to implicate someone through
any act of omission or commission.
h. If any member or Chairperson tries
to or actually unduly influences any government
functionary.
i. If he commits any act of omission or
commission which is punishable under Prevention
of Corruption Act or is a misconduct.
j. If a member or the Chairperson in
any way, concerned or interested in any contract or
agreement made by or on behalf of the
Government of India or participates in any way
in the profit thereof or in any benefit
or emolument arising there from otherwise than
as a member and in common with the
other members of an incorporated company, he
shall be deemed to be guilty of
misbehavior.
(3) The following process shall be
followed for the removal of any member or Chairperson:
(a) Any person may move an
application/petition before the Supreme Court seeking removal of
one or more of the members of
Chairperson of Lokpal alleging one or more of the grounds for removal
and providing evidence for the same.
(b) Supreme Court will hear the matter
by a bench of three or more Judges on receipt of such
petition and may take one or more of
the following steps:
(i) order an investigation to be done
by a Special Investigation Team appointed by the
Supreme Court if a prima facie case is
made out and if the matter cannot be judged based on
affidavits of the parties. The Special
Investigation Team shall submit its report within three
months.
(ii) Pending investigations under
sub-clause (i) by Special Investigation Team, the
Supreme Court may decide to order
withdrawal of part or complete work from that member.
(iii) dismiss the petition if no case
is made out
(iv) if the grounds are proved,
recommend to the President for removal of the said
member or Chairperson
(v) direct registration and
investigation of cases with appropriate agencies if there is
prima facie case of commission of an
offence punishable under Prevention of Corruption
Act.
(c) The three judge bench shall be
constituted by a panel of five seniormost judges of the
Supreme Court.
Provided that if there are any
proceedings going on against any judge in Lokpal, he shall not
be a part of either the panel or the
bench.
(d) The Supreme Court shall not dismiss
such petitions in liminae.
(e) If the Supreme Court concludes that
the petition has been made with mischievous or
malafide motives, the Court may order
imposition of fine or imprisonment upto one year
against the complainant.
(f) On receipt of a recommendation from
the Supreme Court under this section, the Prime
Minister shall recommend it to the
President immediately and the President shall order
removal of said members within a month
of receipt of the same.
Powers and Functions of Lokpal
8. Functions of Lokpal: (1) Lokpal shall be
responsible for receiving:
(a) Complaints where there are
allegations of such acts of omission or commission which are
punishable under Prevention of
Corruption Act
(b) Complaints where there are
allegations of misconduct by a government servant
(c) Grievances
(d) Complaints from whistleblowers
(2) Lokpal, after getting such
enquiries and investigations done as it deems fit, may take one or more of
the following actions:
a. Close the case if prima facie, the
complaint is not made out or
b. Initiate prosecution against public
servants as well as those private entities which
are party to the act
c. Order imposition of appropriate
penalties under CCS Conduct Rules
Provided that if an officer is finally
convicted under Prevention of Corruption
Act, major penalty of dismissal shall
be imposed on such government servant.
d. Order cancellation or modification
of a license or lease or permission or contract or
agreement, which was the subject matter
of investigation.
e. Blacklist the concerned firm or
company or contractor or any other entity involved
in that act of corruption.
f. Issue appropriate directions to
appropriate authorities for redressal of grievance in
such time and in such manner as is
specified in the order.
g. Invoke its powers under this Act if
its orders are not duly complied with and ensure
due compliance of its orders.
h. Take necessary action to provide
protection to a whistleblower as per various
provisions of this Act.
(3) Suo moto initiate appropriate
action under this Act if any case, of the nature mentioned in clauses
(1), (2), (3) or (4), comes to the
knowledge of the Lokpal from any source.
(4) Issue such directions, as are
necessary, from time to time, to appropriate authorities so as to make
such changes in their work practices,
administration or other systems so as to reduce the scope and
possibility for corruption, misconduct
and public grievances.
(5) Lokpal shall be deemed to be
“Disciplinary authority” or “appointing authority” for the purpose of
imposing penalties under CCS Conduct
Rules.
(6) Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption
Act shall be deleted.
(7) Section 197 of CrPC shall not apply
to any proceedings under this Act. All permissions, which need to
be sought for initiating investigations
or for initiating prosecutions under any Act shall be deemed to
have been granted once Lokpal grants
such permissions.
9. Issue of Search Warrant, etc.- (1)
Where, in consequence of information in his possession, the Lokpal
(a) has reason to believe that any
person. –
(i) to whom a summon or notice under
this Act, has, been or might be issued,
will not or would not produce or cause
to be produced any property, document
or thing which will be necessary or
useful for or relevant to any inquiry or other
proceeding to be conducted by him;
(ii) is in possession of any money,
bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or
thing and such money, bullion,
jewellery or other valuable article or thing
represents either wholly or partly
income or property which has not been
disclosed to the authorities for the
purpose of any law or rule in force which
requires such disclosure to be made; or
(b) considers that the purposes of any
inquiry or other proceedings to be conducted by him will
be served by a general search or
inspection,
he may by a search warrant authorize
any Police officer not below the rank of an Inspector of Police to
conduct a search or carry out an
inspection in accordance therewith and in particular to, -
(i) enter and search any building or
place where he has reason to suspect that such property,
document, money, bullion, jewellery or other
valuable article or thing is kept;
(ii) search any person who is
reasonably suspected of concealing about his person any article
for which search should be made;
(iii) break open the lock of any door,
box, locker safe, almirah or other receptacle for
exercising the powers conferred by
sub-clause (i) where the keys thereof are not available.
Seize any such property, document,
money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing
found as a result of such search;
(iv) place marks of identification on
any property or document or make or cause to be made;
extracts or copies therefrom; or
(v) make a note or an inventory of any
such property, document, money, bullion, Jewellery or
other valuable article or thing.
(2) The provisions of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, relating to search and seizure shall apply, so
far as may be, to searches and seizures
under sub-section (1).
(3) A warrant issued under sub-section
(1) shall for all purposes, be deemed to be a warrant issued by a
court under section 93 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973.
10. Evidence - (1) Subject to the
provisions of this section, for the purpose of any investigation (including
the preliminary inquiry, if any, before
such investigation) under this Act, the Lokpal may require any
public servant or any other person who,
in his opinion is able to furnish information or produce
documents relevant to the
investigation, to furnish any such information or produce any such
document.
(2) For the purpose of any such
investigation (including the preliminary inquiry) the Lokpal shall
have all the powers of a civil court
while trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 , in respect
of the following matters, namely:-
(a) Summoning and enforcing the
attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
(b) Requiring the discovery and
production of any document;
(c) Receiving evidence on affidavits;
(d) Requisitioning any public record or
copy thereof from any court or office ;
(e) Issuing commissions for the
examination of witnesses or documents ;
(f) ordering payment of compensatory
cost in respect of a false or vexatious claim or
defence;
(g) ordering cost for causing delay;
(h) Such other matters as may be
prescribed.
(3) Any proceeding before the Lokpal
shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding with in the
meaning of section 193 of the Indian
Penal Code.
11. Reports of Lokpal, etc. (1) The Chairperson
of Lokpal shall present annually a consolidated report in
prescribed format on its performance to
the President.
(2) On receipt of the annual report,
the President shall cause a copy thereof together with an
explanatory memorandum to be laid
before each House of the Parliament.
(3) The Lokpal shall publish every
month on its website the list of cases disposed with brief details of
each such case, outcome and action
taken or proposed to be taken in that case. It shall also publish lists
of all cases received by the Lokpal
during the previous month, cases disposed and cases which are
pending.
12. Lokpal to be a deemed police
officer: (1) For the purposes of section 36 of Criminal Procedure Code,
the Chairperson, members of Lokpal and
the officers in investigation wing of Lokpal shall be deemed to
be police officers.
(2) While investigating any offence
under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, they shall be competent to
investigate any offence under any other
law in the same case.
13. Powers in case of non-compliance of
orders: (1) Each order of Lokpal shall clearly specify the names
of the officials who are required to
execute that order, the manner in which it should be executed and
the time period within which that order
should be complied with.
(2) If the order is not complied with
within the time or in the manner directed, Lokpal may decide to
impose a fine on the officials
responsible for the non-compliance of its orders.
(3) The Drawing and Disbursing Officer
of that Department shall be directed to deduct such amount of
fine as is clearly specified by the
Lokpal in its order made in sub-section (2) from the salaries of the
officers specified in the order.
Provided that no penalty shall be
imposed without giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Provided that if the Drawing and
Disbursing Officer fails to deduct the salary as specified in the said
order, he shall make himself liable for
a similar penalty.
(4) In order to get its orders complied
with, the Lokpal shall have, and exercise the same jurisdiction
powers and authority in respect of
contempt of itself as a High court has and may exercise, and,
for this purpose, the provisions of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Central Act 70 of 1971)
shall have the effect subject to the
modification that the references therein to the High Court
shall be construed as including a
reference to the Lokpal.
13A. Special Judges under section 4 of Prevention
of Corruption Act: On an annual basis, Lokpal shall
make an assessment of the number of
Special Judges required under section 4 of Prevention of
Corruption Act 1988 in each area and
the Government shall appoint such number of Judges within three
months of receipt of such
recommendation.
Provided that Lokpal shall recommend
such number of Special Judges so that trial in each case under
this Act is completed within a year.
13B. Issue of Letter Rogatory: A bench of Lokpal
shall have powers to issue Letters Rogatory in any case
pending with Lokpal.
Functioning of Lokpal
14. Functioning of Lokpal: (1) The Chairperson
shall be responsible for overall administration and
supervision of the institution of
Lokpal.
(2) All policy level decisions
including formulation of regulations, developing internal systems for the
functioning of Lokpal, assigning
functions to various officials in Lokpal, delegation of powers to various
functionaries in Lokpal etc shall be
taken by the Chairperson and the members collectively as a body.
(3) The Chairperson shall have an
annual meeting with the Prime Minister to assess the needs of Lokpal
for finances and manpower. Lokpal shall
be provided resources by the Government on the basis of
outcome of this meeting.
(4) Lokpal shall function in benches of
three or more members. Benches shall be constituted randomly
and cases shall be assigned to them
randomly by computer. Each bench shall consist of at least one
member with legal background.
(5) Such benches shall be responsible
for
(i) granting permission to close any
case after a preliminary enquiry
(ii) granting permission to either
close a case after investigations or issuing orders imposing
penalties under CCS Conduct Rules
and/or for initiating prosecution in that case.
(iii) Issuing orders under section 28
and section 13B.
(6) Lokpal may decide to initiate
investigations into any case suo moto also.
(7) The decision to initiate
investigation or prosecution against any member of the Cabinet or any judge
of High Court or Supreme Court shall be
taken in a meeting of all the existing members and the
Chairperson. Minutes and records of
such meetings shall be made public.
15. Making a complaint to the Lokpal: (1) Subject to the
provisions of this Act, any person may make a
complaint under this Act to the Lokpal.
Provided that in case of a grievance,
if the person aggrieved is dead or for any reason, unable to
act for himself, the complaint may be
made or if it is already made may be continued by his legal
representatives or by any other person
who is authorized by him in writing in this behalf.
(2) A complaint could be on a plain
paper but should contain all such details as prescribed by Lokpal.
(3) On receipt of a complaint, the
Lokpal shall decide whether it is an allegation or a grievance or a
request for whistleblower protection or
a mixture of two or more of these.
(4) Every complaint shall have to be
compulsorily disposed off by the Lokpal.
Provided that no complaint, other than
those which are anonymous or pseudonymous, shall be closed
without hearing the complainant.
16. Matters which may be investigated
by the Lokpal– Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Lokpal
may investigate any action which is
taken by or with the general or specific approval of a public servant
where a complaint involving a grievance
or an allegation is made in respect of such action.
Provided that the Lokpal may also
investigate such action suo moto or if it is referred to it by the
government, if such action can be or
could have been in his recorded opinion, subject of a grievance or
an allegation.
17. Matters not subject to
investigation:- (1) The Lokpal shall not conduct any investigation under this
Act in case of a grievance in respect
of any action-
(i) if the complainant has or had, any
remedy by way of appeal, revision, review or any other
remedy before any other authority
provided in any other law and he has not availed of the
same.
(ii) Taken by a judicial or
quasi-judicial body, unless the complainant alleges malafides
(iii) If the substance of the entire
grievance is pending before any court or quasi-judicial body
of competent jurisdiction.
(iv) any grievance where there is
inordinate and inexplicable delay.
(2) Nothing in this Act shall be
construed as authorising the Lokpal to investigate any action which is
taken by or with the approval of the
Presiding Officer of either House of Parliament.
(3) The provisions of this Act shall be
in addition to the provisions of any other enactment or any rule or
law under which any remedy by way of
appeal, revision, review or in any other manner is available to a
person making a complaint under this
Act in respect of any action and nothing in this Act shall limit or
affect the right of such person to
avail of such remedy.
(4) Nothing in this section shall bar Lokpal
from entertaining a complaint making an allegation of
misconduct or corruption or a complaint
from a whistleblower seeking protection.
18. Provisions relating to complaints
and investigations-
(i) (a) The Lokpal, on receipt of a
complaint in the nature of an allegation or a grievance or a
combination of the two, or in a case
initiated on his own motion, may on perusing the
documents, either decide to proceed to
enquire or investigate into that complaint or decide,
to make such preliminary inquiry before
proceeding to enquire or investigate into such
complaint or direct any other person to
make such preliminary inquiry as it deems fit for
ascertaining whether there exists
reasonable ground for conducting the investigation. The
outcome of such preliminary enquiry,
and if the complaint is being closed along with
reasons for the same and all material
collected during preliminary enquiry, shall be
communicated to the complainant.
Provided that if any case is closed,
all documents related thereto shall thereafter be
treated as public. Every month, a list
of all such cases shall be put on the website with
reasons for closing a case. All
material connected with such closed cases will be provided to
anyone seeking it under Right to
Information Act.
Provided further that if the complaint
contains verifiable and specific information about
misconduct or corruption, then that
case shall not be rejected even if the complaint is
anonymous.
Provided further that no complaint of
allegation shall be rejected by questioning the
motives or intention of the
complainant.
Provided further that all hearings
before Lokpal shall be video recorded and shall be
available to any member of the public
on payment of copying costs.
(b) The procedure for preliminary
enquiry of a complaint shall be such as the Lokpal deems
appropriate in the circumstances of the
case and in particular, the Lokpal may, if it deems
necessary to do so, call for the
comments of the public servant concerned.
Provided that the preliminary enquiry
should be completed and a decision taken whether
to close a case or to proceed with
investigations within one month of receipt of any
complaint.
(ii) Where the Lokpal proposes, either
directly or after making preliminary inquiry, to conduct
any investigation under this Act, he.-
(a) may make such order as to the safe
custody of documents relevant to the
investigation, as it deems fit.
(b) at appropriate stage of
investigations or in the end, it shall forward a copy of the
complaint, its findings and copy of the
material relied upon to the concerned public
servant and the complainant,
(c) shall afford to such public servant
and the complainant an opportunity to offer
comments and be heard.
Provided that such hearing shall be
held in public, except in such rare circumstances, to
be recorded in writing, will it be held
in camera.
(iii) The conduct of an investigation
under this Act against a Public servant in respect of any
action shall not affect such action, or
any power or duty of any other public servant to take
further action with respect to any
matter subject to the investigation.
(iv) If, during the course of
preliminary inquiry or investigation under this Act, the Lokpal is
prima facie satisfied that the
allegation or grievance in respect of any action is likely to be
sustained either wholly or partly, he
may, through an interim order, direct the public servant
concerned to stay the implementation or
enforcement of the decision or action complained
against, or to take such mandatory or
preventive action, on such terms and conditions, as he
may specify in his order to prevent
further harm from taking place.
(v) The Lokpal, either during the
course of investigations, if it is satisfied that prosecution is
likely to be initiated in that case, or
at the end of the investigations at the time of initiating
prosecution, shall make a list of
moveable and immoveable assets of all the accused in that
case and shall notify the same. No
transfer of the same shall be permitted after such
notification. In the event of final
conviction, the court shall be empowered to recover loss
determined under section 19 of this Act
from this property, in addition to other measures.
(vi) If during the course of
investigation or enquiry into a complaint, Lokpal feels that
continuance of a public servant in that
position could adversely affect the course of
investigations or enquiry or that the
said person is likely to impact evidence or witnesses,
the Lokpal may issue appropriate orders
including transfer of that public servant from that
position or his suspension.
Provided that such orders shall not be
passed against the Prime Minister.
(vii) In case of a grievance, the
Lokpal may issue interim orders to the appropriate authority
recommending grant of interim relief to
the complainant if he is satisfied at any stage of
preliminary inquiry on investigation
that the complainant has sustained injustice or undue
hardship in consequence of any decision
or action of a public servant.
(viii) The Lokpal may, at any stage of
inquiry or investigation under this Act, direct through an
interim order, appropriate authorities
to take such action as is necessary, including
suspension of a government servant,
pending inquiry or investigation.-
(i) to safeguard wastage or damage of
public property or public revenue by the
administrative acts of the public
servant;
(ii) to prevent further acts of
misconduct by the public servant;
(iii) to prevent the public servant
from secreting the assets allegedly acquired by him by
corrupt means;
(ix) Where after investigation into a
complaint, the Lokpal is satisfied that the complaint
involving an allegation against the
public servant is substantiated and that the public servant
concerned should not continue to hold
the post held by him, the Lokpal shall pass orders to
that effect. In case of public servant
being a Minister, Lokpal shall make such
recommendation to the President, who
shall decide either to accept such recommendation
or reject it within a month of its
receipt.
Provided that the provisions of this
section shall not apply to the Prime Minister.
(x) If, after enquiry into a grievance
and after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard
to both the complainant and the public
authority, the Lokpal is satisfied that such grievance
is substantiated either wholly or
partly, he shall,
i. Pass appropriate orders directing
appropriate authorities to redress the grievance
in a manner and within the time
prescribed in the order, and
ii. Direct the appropriate authorities
to deduct from the salary of the officials
mentioned in the order, such penalty
amounts as are directed by Lokpal , which
shall not be less than Rs 250 per day
of delay calculated from day the time limit
mentioned in citizens’ charter for
redressing that grievance got over, and
iii. Direct the appropriate authorities
to compensate the complainant with such
amounts as mentioned in the order.
Provided that any grievance shall be
disposed within 15 days of its receipt.
Provided further that if it relates to
life and liberty of a person or if the matter is such as to
warrant immediate attention and the
Lokpal is so satisfied, the same shall be disposed
within 48 hours.
(xi) All records and information of
Lokpal shall be public and shall be provided under Right to
Information Act, even at the stage of
investigation or enquiry, unless release of such
information would adversely affect the
process of enquiry or investigation.
Provided that no information in any
case shall be withheld under Right to Information
Act after the completion of enquiry or
investigation.
Recovery of Loss to the Government and
punishments
19. Recovery of loss to the Government: If a person is
convicted of an offence under Prevention of
Corruption Act, then the trial court
will also quantify the loss caused to the government and apportion
that amount to various convicts from
whom this money must be recovered as arrears of land revenue.
19A. Punishments for offences: For offences
mentioned in Chapter III of Prevention of Corruption Act,
punishment shall not be less than five
years which may extend upto life imprisonment.
Provided that if the accused is any
officer of the rank of Joint Secretary in the state or above or a
Minister, the punishment shall not be
less than ten years.
Provided further that if the offence is
of the nature mentioned in proviso to section 2(4) of this Act and if
the beneficiary is any corporate house,
in addition to other punishments mentioned in this Act and
under Prevention of Corruption Act, a
fine amounting to five times the loss caused to the government
shall be recovered from the accused and
the recovery may be done from the assets of the company and
from the personal assets of all
Directors of the company, if the assets of the accused are inadequate.
Whistleblower protection
20. Protection of Whistleblower: (1) A whistleblower may
write to Lokpal seeking protection from
threat of physical or professional
victimization or if he has been subjected to such professional or
physical victimization.
(2) On receiving such a complaint,
Lokpal shall take following steps:
(a) Threat of professional
victimization: Lokpal shall conduct appropriate enquiries and if it feels
that there is a real threat to the
person and the threat is on account of that person having made
an allegation under this Act, then the
Lokpal shall pass appropriate orders, as soon as possible
but in not more than a month of receipt
of such complaint, directing appropriate authorities to
take such steps as directed by the
Lokpal.
(b) If a person complains that he has
already been victimized professionally on account of
making an allegation under this Act,
Lokpal shall, after conducting enquiries, if he is of the
opinion that the victimization is
indeed because of that person’s having made an allegation
under this Act, pass appropriate
orders, as soon as possible but in not more than a month,
directing appropriate authorities to
take such steps as directed by the Lokpal.
Provided that for clause (a) Lokpal
may, but for clause (b) the Lokpal shall, also issue
orders imposing penalties under CCS
Conduct Rules against the officer or officials who issued
threats or caused victimization.
Provided further that no such penalties
shall be imposed without giving an opportunity
of being heard to the affected
officials.
(c) Threat of physical victimization:
Lokpal shall conduct appropriate enquiries and if it feels that
there is a real threat to the person
and the threat is on account of that person having made an
allegation under this Act or for having
filed an RTI application to any public authority covered
under this Act, then notwithstanding
anything contained in any other law, the Lokpal shall pass
appropriate orders, as soon as possible
but in not more than a week, directing appropriate
authorities, including police, to take
such steps as directed by the Lokpal to provide adequate
security to that person, to register
criminal cases against those who are issuing threats and also
to take all such steps necessary to
mitigate circumstances leading to such threat.
Provided that if the threat is
imminent, Lokpal may decide to act immediately, within a
few hours to prevent physical assault
on that person.
(d) If a person complains that he has
already been physically assaulted on account of making an
allegation under this Act and if Lokpal
is satisfied after conducting enquiries that the person has
been assaulted because of his having
made an allegation under this Act or for filing an RTI
application in any of the public
authorities covered under this Act, then notwithstanding
anything else contained in any other
law, the Lokpal shall pass such orders, as soon as possible
but in not more than 24 hours,
directing the concerned authorities to take such steps as
directed by the Lokpal to provide
adequate security to that person, to register criminal cases
and also to ensure that no further harm
visits on that person.
(e) If the whistleblower has alleged an
act punishable under Prevention of Corruption Act, then
for cases under clause (c), Lokpal may
and for cases under clause (d), the Lokpal shall, assign the
allegations made by that person to a
special team, put it on a fast track and complete
investigations in that case in not more
than a month.
(f) If the whistleblower has alleged an
act punishable under any law other than the Prevention
of Corruption Act, then for cases under
clause (c), Lokpal may and for cases under clause (d), the
Lokpal shall, direct the agency which
has the powers to enforce that law to assign the
allegations made by the whistleblower
to a special team, put it on a fast track and complete
investigations in that case in such time
as directed by the Lokpal.
(g) Lokpal shall have the powers to
issue directions to appropriate agencies in the cases covered
under clause (f), monitor such
investigations and if necessary, issue directions to that agency to
do the investigations in the manner as
directed by the Lokpal.
(3) If any complainant requests that
his identity should be kept secret, Lokpal shall ensure the same.
Lokpal shall prescribe detailed
procedures on how such complainants shall be dealt with.
(4) Lokpal shall Issue orders to the
Public Authorities to make necessary changes in their policies and
practices to prevent recurrence of
victimization.
Grievance Redressal Systems
21. Citizens’ Charters: (1) Each public
authority shall be responsible for ensuring the preparation and
implementation of Citizens Charter,
within a reasonable time, and not exceeding one year from the
coming into force of this Act.
(2) Every Citizens Charter shall
enumerate the commitments of the respective public authority to the
citizens, officer responsible for
meeting each such commitment and the time limit with in which the
commitment shall be met.
(3) Each public authority shall
designate an official called Public Grievance Redressal Officer, whom a
complainant should approach for any
violation of the Citizens Charter.
(4) Every public authority shall review
and revise its Citizens Charter at least once every year through a
process of public consultation.
(5) Lokpal may direct any public
authority to make such changes in their citizens’ charter as are
mentioned in that order.
(6) No grievance shall be accepted by
Lokpal if 15 days have not elapsed after submission of complaint
by the complainant with the Public
Grievance redressal Officer of that Public Authority.
Provided that if Lokpal feels that considering
the gravity or urgency of the grievance, it is
necessary to do so, the Lokpal may
decide to accept such grievance earlier also.
Employees and staff and authorities in
Lokpal
22. Chief Vigilance Officer: (1) There shall be a
Chief Vigilance Officer in each public authority to be
selected and appointed by Lokpal.
(2) He shall not be from the same
public authority.
(3) He shall be a person of impeccable
integrity and ability to take proactive measures against
corruption.
(4) He shall be responsible for
accepting complaints against any public authority and shall transfer the
complaints related to other public
authorities within two days of receipt.
(5) He shall be responsible for
carrying out all such responsibilities as assigned to him from time to time
by Lokpal including dealing with
complaints in the manner as laid down by Lokpal from time to time.
Provided that the complaints which
require investigations under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 shall
be transferred to the Investigative
wing of Lokpal.
Provided further that the complaints,
other than grievances, against officers of the level of Joint
Secretary or above shall not be dealt
by the Chief Vigilance Officer and shall be transferred to the
Lokpal, who shall set up a committee of
Chief Vigilance Officers of three other public authorities to
enquire into such complaint.
(6) All the grievances shall be
received and disposed by Chief Vigilance Officer on behalf of Lokpal, if the
citizen fails to get satisfactory
redressal from Public Grievance Officer under section 21 of this Act.
23. Staff of Lokpal, etc.- (1) There shall be
such officers and employees as may be prescribed to assist
the Lokpal in the discharge of their
functions under this Act.
(2) The number and categories of
officers and employees shall be decided by the Lokpal in
consultation with the government.
(3) The categories, recruitment and
conditions of service of the officers and employees referred
in sub-section (1) including such
special conditions or special pay as may be necessary for enabling them
to act without fear in the discharge of
their functions, shall be such as may be prescribed according to
the recommendations of Lokpal.
Provided that no official, whose
integrity is in doubt, shall be considered for being posted in
Lokpal.
Provided further that all officers and
employees, who work in Lokpal on deputation or otherwise
shall be eligible for the same terms
and conditions as prescribed under this clause.
(4) Without prejudice to the provisions
of sub-section (1), the Lokpal may for the purpose of
conducting investigations under this
Act utilize the services of.-
(a) any officer or investigating agency
of the Central Government; or
(b) any officer or investigating agency
of any other Government with the prior
concurrence of that Government; or
(c) any person or any other agency.
(5) The officers and other employees
referred to in sub-section (1) shall be under the
administrative and disciplinary control
of the Lokpal:
(6) Lokpal shall have the powers to
choose its own officials. Lokpal may enlist officials on
deputation from other government
agencies for a fixed tenure or it may enlist officials on permanent
basis from other government agencies or
it may appoint people from outside on permanent basis or on
a fixed tenure basis.
(7) The staff and officers shall be
entitled to such pay scales and other allowances, which may be
different and more than the ordinary
pay scales in the Central Government, as are decided by the Lokpal
from time to time, in consultation with
the Prime Minister, so as to attract honest and efficient people
to work in Lokpal.
24. Repeal and savings – (1) The Central
Vigilance Commission Act shall stand repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, any
act or thing done under the said Act shall be deemed to have been
done under this Act and may be
continued and completed under the corresponding provisions of this
Act.
(3) All enquiries and investigations
and other disciplinary proceedings pending before the Central
Vigilance Commission and which have not
been disposed of, shall stand transferred to and be continued
by the Lokpal as if they were commenced
before him under this Act.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained
in any Act, the posts of the Secretary and other Officers and
Employees of the Central Vigilance Commission
are hereby abolished and they are hereby appointed as
the Secretary and other officers and
employees of the Lokpal. The salaries, allowances and other terms
and conditions of services of the said
Secretary, officers and other employees shall, until they are varied,
be the same as to which they were
entitled to immediately before the commencement of this Act.
(5) All vigilance administration under
the control of all Departments of Central Government, Ministries
of the Central Government, corporations
established by or under any Central Act, Government
companies, societies and local
authorities owned or controlled by the Central Government shall stand
transferred, alongwith its personnel,
assets and liabilities to Lokpal for all purposes.
(6) The personnel working in vigilance
wings of the agencies mentioned in sub-section (5) shall be
deemed to be on deputation to Lokpal
for a period of five years from the date they are transferred to
Lokpal. However, Lokpal may decide to
repatriate any one of them anytime.
(7) That Department from where any
personnel have been transferred to Lokpal under sub-section (5),
shall cease to have any control over
the administration and functions of transferred personnel.
(8) Lokpal shall rotate the personnel
and create vigilance wing of each department in such a way that no
personnel from the same department get
posted for vigilance functions in the same department.
(9) No person shall be employed with
Lokpal against whom any vigilance enquiry or any criminal case is
pending at the time of being
considered.
25. Investigation Wing of Lokpal: (1) There shall be an
investigation wing at Lokpal.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained
in section 17 of Prevention of Corruption Act, such officers of
Investigation wing, upto the level as
decided by Lokpal, shall have, in relation to the investigation and
arrest of persons throughout India, in
connection with investigation of complaints under this Act, all the
powers, duties, privileges and
liabilities which members of Delhi Special Police Establishment have in
connection with the investigation of
offences committed therein.
(3) That part of Delhi Special Police
Establishment, in so far as it relates to investigation and prosecution
of offences alleged to have been
committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, shall stand
transferred, alongwith its employees,
assets and liabilities to Lokpal for all purposes.
(4) That part of Delhi Special Police
Establishment, which has been transferred under sub-section (3),
shall form part of Investigation Wing
of Lokpal.
(5) The Central Government shall cease
to have any control over the transferred part and its personnel.
(6) The salaries, allowances and other
terms and conditions of services of the personnel transferred
under sub-section (3) shall be the same
as to which they were entitled to immediately before the
commencement of this Act.
(7) All cases which were being dealt by
that part of Delhi Special Police Establishment, which has been
transferred under sub-section (3),
shall stand transferred to Lokpal.
(8) After completion of investigation
in any case, the investigation wing shall present the case to an
appropriate bench of Lokpal, which
shall decide whether to grant permission for prosecution or not.
26. Complaints against officers or
employees of Lokpal: (1) Complaints against employees or officers of
Lokpal shall be dealt with separately
and as per provisions of this section.
(2) Such complaint could relate to an
allegation of an offence punishable under Prevention of Corruption
Act or a misconduct or a dishonest
enquiry or investigation.
(3) As soon as such a complaint is
received, the same shall be displayed on the website of Lokpal,
alongwith the contents of the
complaint.
(4) Investigations into each such
complaint shall be completed within a month of its receipt.
(5) In addition to examining the
allegations against the said official, the allegations shall especially be
examined against sections 107, 166,
167, 177, 182, 191, 192, 196, 199, 200, 201, 202, 204, 217, 218,
219, 463, 464, 468, 469, 470, 471, 474
of Indian Penal Code.
(6) If, during the course of
investigations, the Lokpal feels that the charges are likely to be sustained,
the
Lokpal shall divest such officer of all
his responsibilities and powers and shall place him under
suspension.
(7) If after completion of enquiry or
investigations, Lokpal decides to prosecute that person under
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or
holds him guilty of any misconduct or of conducting dishonest
enquiry or investigations, then that person
shall not work with Lokpal anymore. Lokpal shall either
dismiss that person from the job, if
that person is in the employment of Lokpal, or shall repatriate him, if
he is on deputation.
Provided that no order under this
clause shall be passed without giving reasonable opportunity of being
heard to the accused person.
Provided further that order under this
clause shall be passed within 15 days of completion of
investigations.
(8) There shall be a separate wing in
Lokpal to deal with complaints against officers or staff of Lokpal.
(9) Lokpal shall take all steps to
ensure that all enquiries and investigations on complaints against its
own staff and officials are conducted
in most transparent and honest manner.
27. Protection- (1) No suit,
prosecution, or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Chairperson or
members or against any officer,
employee, agency or person referred to in Section 14(4) in respect of
anything which is in good faith done
while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official
duties under this Act.
(2) No proceedings of the Lokpal shall
be held to be bad for want of form and except on the ground of
jurisdiction, no proceedings or
decision of the Lokpal shall be liable to be challenged, reviewed, quashed
or called in question in any court of
ordinary Civil Jurisdiction.
Miscellaneous
28. Public Servants to submit property
statements-
(1) Every public servant, other than
those mentioned in Section 2(11)(a) to (c), shall within three months
after the commencement of this Act and
thereafter before the 30th June of every year submit to the
head of that public authority, in the
form prescribed by Lokpal, a statement of his assets and liabilities
and those of the members of his family.
Public servants mentioned in sections 2(11)(a) to (c) shall
submit their returns in a format
prescribed by the Lokpal to the Lokpal with the aforesaid time lines.
(2) The Head of each public authority
shall ensure that all such statements are put on the website by 31st
August of that year.
(3) If no such statement is received by
the Head of that public authority from any such public servant
within the time specified in
sub-section (1), the Head of that public authority shall direct the concerned
public servant to do so immediately. If
within next one month, the public servant concerned does not
submit such statement, the Head shall
stop the salary and allowances of that public servant till he
submits such statement.
Explanation- In this section “family of
a public servant” means the spouse and such children and
parents of the public servant as are
dependent on him.
(4) The Lokpal may initiate prosecution
against such public servant under Section 176 IPC.
(5) If any public servant furnishes any
statement, which is subsequently found to be incorrect, then
Lokpal, in addition to taking action
against the said public servant under other sections of this Act, may
also impose a penalty upto a maximum of
50% of the value of the additional property subsequently
detected. Lokpal shall also intimate
such information to the Income Tax Department for appropriate
action.
29. Power to delegate and assign
functions: (1) Lokpal shall be competent to delegate its powers and
assign functions to the officials
working in Lokpal.
(2) All functions carried out and
powers exercised by such officials shall be deemed to have been so
done by the Lokpal.
Provided that the following functions
shall be performed by the benches and cannot be delegated:
(i) Granting permission to initiate
prosecution in any case.
(ii) Order for dismissal of any
government servant under CCS Conduct Rules.
(iii) Passing orders under section 10
on complaints against officials and staff of Lokpal.
(iv) Pass orders in cases of
complaints, other than grievances, against officers of the level of Joint
Secretary and above.
30. Time limits: (1) Preliminary
enquiry under sub-section (1) of section 9 of this Act should be
completed within a month of receipt of
complaint.
Provided that the enquiry officer shall
be liable for an explanation if the enquiry is not completed within
this time limit.
(2) Investigation into any allegation
shall be completed within six months, and in any case, not more
than one year, from the date of receipt
of complaint.
(3) Trial in any case filed by Lokpal
should be completed within one year. Adjournments should be
granted in rarest circumstances.
31. Penalty for false complaint- (1) Notwithstanding
anything contained in this Act, if someone makes
any false or frivolous complaint under
this Act, Lokpal may impose such fines on that complainant as it
deems fit.
Provided that no fine can be imposed
without giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
(2) Such fines shall be recoverable as
dues under Land Revenue Act.
(3) A complaint or allegation once made
under this Act shall not be allowed to be withdrawn.
31A. Preventive measures: (1) Lokpal shall, at
regular intervals, either study itself or cause to be studied
the functioning of all public
authorities falling within its jurisdiction and in consultation with respective
public authority, issue such directions
as it deems fit to prevent incidence of corruption in future.
(2) Lokpal shall also be responsible
for creating awareness about this Act and involving general public in
curbing corruption and
maladministration.
32. Power to make Rules – (1) The Government
may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules
for the purpose of carrying into effect
the provisions of this Act.
Provided that such rules shall be made
only in consultation and with the approval of Lokpal.
(2) In particular, and without
prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, such rules may
provide for .-
(i) the allowance and pensions payable
to and other conditions of service of the Chairperson and
members of Lokpal;
(ii) the powers of a Civil Court which
may be exercised by the Lokpal under clause (h) of sub-section
(2) of section 11;
(iii) the salary, allowances,
recruitment and other conditions of service of the staff and employees of
the Lokpal;
(iv) any other matter for which rules
have to be made are necessary under this Act.
(3) Any rule made under this Act may be
made with retrospective effect and when such a rule is
made the reasons for making the rule
shall be specified in a Statement laid before both Houses of the
Parliament.
33. Removal of difficulties- Notwithstanding
anything contained in this Act, the President, in
consultation with Lokpal or on request
of Lokpal may, by order, make such provision -
(i) for bringing the provisions of this
Act into effective operation;
(ii) for continuing the enquiries and
investigations pending before the Central Vigilance Commission by
the Lokpal.
34. Power to make regulations: Lokpal shall have
power to make its own regulations for the smooth
functioning of the institution and to
effectively implement various provisions of this Act.
35. This Act shall override the provisions of all other laws
edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R.
@ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE ,
LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA
cell : 91
9341820313
home page:
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/
e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com , naghrw@yahoo.com