Collegium or MAFIA
Dalit’s
Diary - e News Weekly
Working For The Rights
& Survival Of The Oppressed
Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R… VOL.11 issue.38…… . 04 /
10 / 2017
Editorial : Judge’s
MAFIA - Accountability of
Judges
Now in
India , along with
criminalization of politics , police and executive criminalization of Judiciary is also
evident. However Judges
who take lakhs of rupees salary & perks from
public exchequer are not accountable to public. Judges don’t respond
to RTI queries nor reply
to legal notices nor
the decisions of transfer of
judges , elevation or non elevation of judges
are made public. If a judge has
adverse observations from Intelligence Bureau or any other
statutory body which makes him unfit for
elevation in such a circumstance that
judge is even unfit to continue in his
existing post.
The collegiums of Judges is behaving like a MAFIA in league with powers that be. The honest judges who don’t favor mafia face dismissal , arrest , non elevation , transfer , etc. Judge’s
MAFIA has time & again sent
such subtle message to
honest judges. Judges
who have committed crimes
but has the blessings of MAFIA get
promotions , favorable postings , enquiries
against them will be manipulated
to save them.
Few judges although have committed crimes are technically staying as INNOCENTS by
manipulating fair investigation ,
prosecution against them.
This is an appeal to HONEST few in judiciary to demand accountability of their corrupt colleagues.
Judges ,
Police – Learn Honesty Life of illegally terminated judge Mr.Gwal is a lesson of honesty for all judges & police. Inspite of being HONEST in his duties , Mr.Gwal is suffering at the hands of powers that be & judicial mafia. Mr.Gwal could have choosen the easy , luxurious path of favoring powers and could have enjoyed luxurious life with his family. He rightly chose the path to uphold constitution ended up even without money to pay his children’s school fees. Even apex court didn’t come to his rescue. SHAME SHAME . Except for few honest judges & police , many of them are leading lifestyles beyond the sources of their legal income. Few of them are successful in manipulating legal process to continue in service , get promotions despite grave criminal allegations against them. Some judges have even entered supreme court , what a shame ? They must learn righteousness honesty from Mr.Gwal.
There are fake lawyers , advocates with uncle judge connections who are leading life styles beyond the legal sources of their income. These advocates are cheating the public & court as well making contempt of them. Why not criminal prosecutions against those guilty lawyers , advocates ?
Above all these type of corrupt people in gowns of judges , advocates & corrupt police preach others about honesty , integrity and prosecute other criminals while they themselves are criminals. It is like a PROSTITUTE preaching about virginity , chastity to a young girl.
Our whole hearted respects to few honest judges , police & advocates in public service. It is an appeal to them to prosecute their corrupt colleagues. We once again offer our conditional services to SCI , to apprehend legally prosecutes criminal judges , criminal police & criminals in public service. Is CJI ready ?
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Your’s ,
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
PIL – JAIL Dipak Mishra Unfit Judge & Others
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & H.E. Honourable President of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , Indian’s Diary & Dalit’s Diary ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
In his death note Former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Mr.Kalikho Pul has clearly alleged involvement of CJI Khehar , Dipak Mishra , President Mukherjee & others in the crime.
Justice Dipak Mishra has a criminal past of fraud , cheating the authorities to get land allotment. . He is unfit even to be a munsiff judge let alone CJI. He has managed the crime cover up well.
He and present CJI Khehar have helped the union government in their unjust illegal actions like unjust imposition of president rule and change of chief miniser in few states, cover up of Corporate scams like Birla - Sahara , lake , forest , revenue land encroachments by powerful , etc. In turn as a payout Union government has made them Chief Justice of India and helped the judges in cover up of their own crimes. Quid Pro Quo.
CJI Khehar & Dipak Mishra have effectively stalled proper investigations into crimes committed by them. They have even stalled the legal prosecution. All through Union Government and respective state governments have helped them inspite of clinching evidences against two judges.
Nowadays judges who don't dance to the tune of corrupt higher judges , corrupt ministers , don't get promotions. Even may loose their jobs or land up in jail for upholding justice.
If Dipak Mishra is made CJI , it will be roaring business for corrupt mafia. Innocents , commoners will be sent to jail , may even be hanged while the rich criminals roams free.
Since 20 years we are appealing to Chief Justice of India concerning public issues , seeking justice from him. Till date no action instead more injustices meted out to silence me after appealing to supreme court and authorities. This itself proves the criminal nexus of judges , police and public sevants.
Police show full bravery ,
courage , use full might of law while acting against innocents ,
commoners. Even takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal
limits while acting against commoners like 3rd degree
torture , arrest / search , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid
night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks ,
their own corrupt colleagues no suo motto action , delayed action
inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get
anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest ,
search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?
Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid
law book while judging cases of commoners , take suo motto
action where as cases involving rich crooks comes before
them inspite of repeated PILs they don’t consider it , let alone take suo motto
action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting
the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?
2. Question(s) of Law:
As per constitution of India , are not all citizens of india equal before law ? Why no action against JS Khehar , Dipak Mishra & Pranab Mukherjee ? Are they special ? WHERE IS THE BRAVERY , COURAGE OF POLICE ? Before big crooks CBI , Police are zeroes.
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice. Prosecution of corrupt Judges , CJI J S Khehar , Supreme Court Judge Dipak Mishra , Former President Mukherjee & Corrupt Public Servants.
4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the cases to perform their duties.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , in the case to perform their duties.
b. To register FIR against Chief Justice of India JS Khehar, Supreme Court Judge Dipak Mishra , Former President of India Mukherjee & others and arrest them for legal prosecution with respect to Orissa Land allotment scam , Arunachal Pradesh Chief minister change over , death of CM Kalikho Pul, Cover up of Birla Sahara Scam , Reliance Oil Basin Scam , Lake & Land Encroachments in bangalore , Karnataka., etc.
c. To constitute an impartial investigation team to investigate the crimes. The team must be accountable to the public.
d. Till investigation is over , hold the promotion of Dipak Mishra to the post of Chief Justice of India.
e . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated 12th August 2017 …………………. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
PIL – Collegium or Judge’s Mafia ?
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & H.E. Honourable President of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , Indian’s Diary & Dalit’s Diary ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Now in India , along with criminalization of politics ,
police and executive criminalization of
Judiciary is also evident. However Judges
who take lakhs of rupees salary & perks from
public exchequer are not accountable to public. Judges don’t respond
to RTI queries nor reply
to legal notices nor
the decisions of transfer of
judges , elevation or non elevation of judges are made public. If a judge has adverse
observations from Intelligence
Bureau or any other statutory body which
makes him unfit for elevation in such a circumstance that judge is even unfit to continue in his existing post.
The collegiums of Judges is behaving like a MAFIA in league with powers that be. The honest judges who don’t favor mafia face dismissal , arrest , non elevation , transfer ,
etc. Judge’s MAFIA
has time & again sent such
subtle message to honest
judges. Judges who
have committed crimes but has the
blessings of MAFIA get promotions , favorable postings , enquiries against them will be manipulated to save them.
Few judges although have committed crimes are technically staying as INNOCENTS by
manipulating fair investigation ,
prosecution against them.
This is an appeal to HONEST few in judiciary to demand
accountability of their corrupt
colleagues.
2. Question(s) of Law:
As per constitution of India , are not all citizens of india equal before law ? Why no action against Judge’s MAFIA ? Are they special ? WHERE IS THE BRAVERY , COURAGE OF POLICE ? Before big crooks CBI , Police are zeroes.
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice. Prosecution of corrupt Judges & Corrupt Public Servants.
4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the cases to perform their duties.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , in the case to perform their duties.
b. to make public the Judge’s collegium decision first to transfer Justice Jayant Patel from Gujarath High Court to Karnataka High Court and afterwards from Karnataka High Court to Allahabad High Court.
c. to make public the Judge’s collegium decision NOT to elevate Uttarakhand chief Justice K M Joseph , Orissa High Court Judge B P Das , Karnataka High Court Judge Jayant Patel.
d. to make public collegium’s decision against Justice Karnan & Sukma Judge Prabhakar Gwal.
e. certain judges although facing grave criminal charges , allegations but in favorable terms with ruling establishment are elevated example Justice Dinakaran , Justice Dipak Mishra , Mysore Roost Resort SEX scandal fame Judges , etc. What is so special about those judges which deserves promotion. Also fair investigation , enquiry , prosecution against such special judges are stalled , buried by higher judges , ruling government , why ? make the reasons for stalling investigations , prosecution public . what is so SPECIAL ? Make that special collegium’s decision public.
f. Is It not shameful to collegium judges that they are public servants , taking huge salaries , perks from public exchequer but unaccountable to public. To make it mandatory accountability of judges to public , accountability of Judge’s collegium to public..
g. to make public the list of judges since independence till date who faced allegations , actions taken or not taken against them with reasons thereof.
h. To build safeguarding mechanism which reassures HONEST JUDGEs that they will not be victimized , persecuted by higher judges , judge’s collegium or ruling government.
i. In many instances relatives of judges are being appointed as judges from bar. To make public the selection criteria for appointment of judges from bar.
j. In many instances the senior advocates get a patient hearing in courts while fair hearing is no given to junior lawyers. Sometimes although junior lawters are making logical argument presiding judge makes harsh comment as though judge himself is more brilliant , wise in the universe. It is unjust & against law. To make public criteria adopted for designating lawyers as seniors & allocating time for senior lawyers / junior lawyers.
k. to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated 30th September 2017 …………………. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
Gujarath High Court Advocate Letter
Many have suggested that Justice
Patel is paying the price of his ruling in the Ishrat Jahan case in Gujarat,
back in 2011
The minister said, “Justice Patel was one of the most honest and best judges I have seen,” calling the development as unfortunate.
Lawyers in Karnataka are also set to boycott work for one day, Advocate-general Madhusudan R Naik told The New Indian Express. An emergency meeting is likely to be held by the state Bar Council.
Justice Patel, who is the senior-most puisne judge had tendered his resignation after he was transferred to Allahabad High Court.
He was eligible to be the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court as Chief Justice SK Mukherjee is set to retire on October 9. But the judge refused to speak on his non-elevation citing “institutional discipline”.
If he had accepted the transfer, Justice Patel would have retired being the third senior judge in Allahabad HC.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, he cited that he did not want to move to a new place for just 10 months.
“I did not want to move to a new place for a period of 10 months. This is the reason I resigned. I have put in 16 years in service,” he said.
This is not the first time that Justice Patel has been passed up for a promotion. The senior judge was the Acting Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court, prior to his transfer to Karnataka.
Many have suggested that Justice Patel is paying the price of his ruling in the Ishrat Jahan case in Gujarat, back in 2011. Justice Patel was part of the division bench that handed over the investigation into the 2004 killings of Ishrat Jahan, Javed Sheikh and two others, to a Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT).
To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice Of India
Supreme Court of India,
Open Letter to the Supreme Court Collegium regarding the transfer and supersession of the seniority of Justice Jayant Patel
The decision of the Collegium transferring Justice Jayant Patel to the Allahabad High Court resulting in his supersession to the post of the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court has shocked the advocates not only in Karnataka, but across the country. Justice Jayant Patel is known as a fair, impartial and independent judge. The decision of the collegium to transfer him has once again brought to the forefront the issues relating to the absolute lack of transparency and accountability in the functioning of the collegium system.
Several attending circumstances raise further doubts as to the propriety of the decision of the collegium. Considering the impeccable record and clinical efficiency of Justice Jayant Patel, becoming the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court was a natural progression in his tenure, which he has now been deprived of. The timing of the transfer clearly shows that it was intended to ensure that Justice Jayant Patel would not be made Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. Further, the transfer being evidently unwarranted at this juncture, having regard to the serious shortage of Judges in the Karnataka High Court, due to more than 50% of the posts of judges being vacant, also, call for disclosure of reasons behind his transfer.
This is not the first time that Justice Jayant Patel has been superseded. Previously, in 2015, when he was the acting Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court, he was transferred to the Karnataka High Court. We must remember that the last famous supersession happened during the emergency, when Justice H.R. Khanna was superseded for his dissenting opinion in the Habeas Corpus case. The lack of transparency and accountability at that juncture had allowed for such grave injustice. It is indeed ironic that after Justice Khanna was vindicated on 24.08.2017 by the Supreme Court in the judgment of the Right to Privacy Case, that the Collegium has taken this decision. The independence of the judiciary is an essential attribute of Rule of law, and the actions taken against Justice Jayant Patel raises serious questions regarding the independence of the judiciary and hence the rule of law itself.
We, the members of the Bangalore Bar are of the opinion that this action against Justice Jayant Patel is symptomatic of the lack of accountability and transparency in the judicial system. This affects the independence of the judiciary and erodes the fundamental values of our Constitution.
Thus, we believe, that in the light of the facts and circumstances narrated above, the independence of the judiciary is at stake. Hence, we demand that the Apex Court Collegium make public the reasons for the transfer of Justice Jayant Patel, the agenda for the meeting in which the decision was taken and the minutes of the meeting of the Collegium. We also seek that the order of transfer issued to him be immediately revoked and his resignation not be accepted.
Supreme Court collegium should explain why Justice Jayant Patel’s transfer was in public interest
The manner in which the transfer was effected has raised questions about transparency in judicial appointments.
The transfer meant Patel lost the opportunity to become chief justice of the Karnataka High Court, where he was the second-most senior judge. In the Allahabad High Court, he would have been relegated to the position of the third-most senior judge. When appointing chief justices, the Supreme Court collegium usually (but not exclusively), considers a candidate’s seniority.
The resignation of Patel, who originally belonged to the Gujarat High Court, has caused a stir in the judiciary. The Karnataka State Bar Association has asked lawyers to abstain from work on October 4 to protest the transfer. In Gujarat, lawyers stopped work on Wednesday.
This was Patel’s second transfer. In 2016, he was moved from Gujarat to Karnataka, where he has since served as a puisne judge.
The manner in which the transfer was effected has raised serious questions about transparency in judicial appointments. Appearing in a debate on NDTV Wednesday evening, senior advocate Dushyant Dave alleged political interference in the decision. He noted that as acting chief justice of the Gujarat High Court, Patel had ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation to inquire into the murder of Mumbai teenager Ishrat Jahan by Gujarat police officers in 2004. They claimed that Jahan and her three companions were conspiring to kill Narendra Modi, who was then Gujarat’s chief minister. The investigation ordered by Patel led to charges being filed against several senior police officers and embarrassed the state government led by Modi.
These allegations aside, Patel’s transfer begs an important question: Did the Supreme Court follow its own observations on transferring judges?
Judicial transfers
Judges are appointed by a a five-member collegium, consisting of the Chief Justice of India and the four most senior judges of the Supreme Court. The collegium system of judges appointing their fellow judges developed over time through judgements of the Supreme Court. The most important of them was the Supreme Court Advocates On Record Association vs Union of India, 1993. The Constitution created a system in which the President would appoint judges after consulting with the Chief Justice of India. But the 1993 verdict effectively gave all powers to appoint judges to the judiciary.It also dealt with their transfers and laid down guidelines on how the process should be handled. Referring to Article 222(1) of the Constitution, which gives the President the power to transfer judges, the judgement stated:
“There is nothing in the language of Article 222(1) to rule out a second transfer of a once transferred judge without his consent but ordinarily the same must be avoided unless there exist pressing circumstances making it unavoidable. Ordinarily a transfer effected in public interest may not be punitive but all the same the Chief Justice of India must take great care to ensure that in the guise of public interest the judge is not being penalised.”
Two things stand out in this observation when applied to Patel’s case. One, he was being transferred for a second time. Two, it is clear from Patel’s resignation that the decision did not have his consent.
Although the consent of the judge being transferred is not strictly necessary, the 1993 judgment makes it clear that consent should be taken “unless there exist pressing circumstances making it unavoidable”. In addition, the circumstances must be in “public interest”.
Here lies the problem. The collegium’s decisions are not made public, which means there is no public scrutiny of the circumstances leading to a decision. Also, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the collegium need not justify its decisions. This is why allegations such as Dave’s are impossible to verify.
Further, transfers are not justiciable, which means that a judge who is transferred cannot challenge the order in the Supreme Court except if the transfer was made without the collegium’s approval – an impossible prospect as the President, following the 1993 order, does not have the power to appoint or transfer judges without the concurrence of the Chief Justice of India. The transfer has to be initiated by the collegium.
This touches upon the most crucial aspect of Patel’s transfer: what were the “pressing circumstances” and “public interest” that necessitated his move to the Allahabad High Court? The answer to this question may never be known given the opacity of the collegium.
One thing, though, is clear from reactions to Patel’s transfer by lawyers in Gujarat and Karnataka: he has a reputation of being an upright and efficient judge. Unlike, say, former Karnataka High Court judge PD Dinakaran, who was moved out to Sikkim in 2010 following corruption allegations, Patel apparently had no serious complaints against him.
Lawyers protest
This is the context in which lawyers’ groups are vociferously protesting Patel’s transfer. A resolution passed by the Karnataka State Bar Council on Tuesday stated:“That the entire legal fraternity is anguished and is greatly disturbed by the shaking of faith/confidence in the collegium system; which has meted out such treatment to the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jayant Patel, who apparently, has satisfactorily discharged his duties and functions as a Judge.
Members of the Bar perceive that, apparently decision makers in judiciary and executive have overlooked the aspirations and spirit of the National Judicial Appointments Commission verdict in achieving transparency by the actions reflected in recent events, like proposed transfer of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jayant Patel on the eve of incumbent Chief Justice of Karnataka retiring and need to appoint another in the vacancy accruing.”
In a 2015 judgement rejecting the proposed National Judicial Appointments Commission, the Supreme Court recommended improving the transparency of the collegium system. But not much has happened on that front. The Centre and the Supreme Court are locked in a battle over the formulation of a new memorandum of procedure for judicial appointments, with the court objecting to certain clauses in the draft that give the Centre a greater say in the process.
Meanwhile, the Bar Council of India has issued a show cause notice to Dave for his allegations against Chief Justice of India Deepak Misra and the collegium. The Supreme Court Bar Association has expressed concern over the manner of Patel’s transfer, saying its executive committee will meet on October 3 to discuss the matter.
What I said on NDTV is the truth, Dushyant Dave responds
Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave has
given an initial response to the news about Bar Council of India (BCI) issuing
a show cause notice against him for his remarks against CJI
Dipak Misra.
Speaking
to Bar & Bench,
Dave stood by his remarks on air stating that what he said on NDTV is the
truth.
“I haven’t still got the notice and not read it .
But what I said on NDTV last night is the truth.”
He
further said that it is a matter of grave concern that the conduct of judges go
unchecked and allegations against CJI Misra were very serious.
“It is a matter of concern for all in legal system
and nation that such conduct of Judges go unchecked. In fact BCI should have
opposed Justice Dipak Misra’s appointment to the highest judicial office to
which only the best and non-controversial person can be appointed. The
allegations against him were serious and those holding Constitutional offices
should have been conscious and not appointed him.”
Dave
said that he has nothing personal against CJI Dipak Misra but the allegations
against him should be investigated.
“These allegations are not even being investigated
but are suppressed from the Nation. I have nothing personal against him but it
worries me as a citizen and a lawyer that with such background, the Executive
is bound to exploit the situation especially when the SC today has to deal with
highly political matters of far reaching consequence.”
Dave
also condemned the Bar Council of India calling it a body which has not held
elections for years under “some pretext”.
“BCI, by doing this gives an opportunity to bring
on fore what should have been debated by Nation earlier. Advocates Act gives no
such power to BCI, a body which has not held elections for years under some
pretext and Mr. Mishra continues to occupy the position as Chairman unduly. I
will happily contest this notice to prove that I was right and BCI is wrong.”
Public Prosecutor Appointment Scamhttp://starofmysore.com/assistant-public-prosecutors-appointment-scam-unearthed/ ,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAEBJsp_Zsg ,
Four Arrested in Delhi Police Recruitment Scam
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/four-arrested-in-delhi-police-recruitment-scam-2998152/ ,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyapam_scam ,
KPSC , Scam
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2362317/CID-probe-exposes-jobs-marriage-scam-KPSC.html ,
http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in/articles/kpsc-recruitment-scam-cid-report-confirms-malpractice ,
Judge Selection Illegal
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-3300929/Did-judges-children-special-treatment-Supreme-Court-examine-answer-sheets-Delhi-judicial-exam-2014-favouritism-complaints.html ,
http://www.timesnow.tv/india/video/sc-judge-rips-into-cji-headed-collegium-shuns-selection-meetings/48804 ,
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/Discrepancies-in-magistrate-test-evaluation-HC-asks-for-registrys-views/articleshow/46470410.cms ,
Top police official in Kerala allegedly caught red-handed while copying in LL.M. exam
http://www.livelaw.in/top-police-official-in-kerala-allegedly-caught-red-handed-while-copying-in-ll-m-exam/ ,
Judges Suspended For Mass Copying
http://news.fullhyderabad.com/hyderabad-news/five-judges-suspended-for-mass-copying-1434.html ,
JAIL Chief Justice Dipak
Mishra
https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/dipak-mishra-unfit-judge
Mishra Threatens Complainant
https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/mishra-threatens-petitioner
Notice To Chief Justice of India
Judicial Tyranny
Judges
SEX crimes
A – Z of
Manipulation of Indian Legal System
50% of higher judiciary corrupt, says ex-SC
judge Markandey Katju
Eight
chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister
In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul
alleges graft by SC judges, Congress
http://www.sify.com/news/in-suicide-note-arunachal-cm-kalikho-pul-alleges-graft-by-sc-judges-congress-news-national-rcruamjjfdhhc.html ,
http://www.sify.com/news/in-suicide-note-arunachal-cm-kalikho-pul-alleges-graft-by-sc-judges-congress-news-national-rcruamjjfdhhc.html ,
Calcutta HC
Justice Karnan calls judiciary corrupt, brings up old allegations against HC
judges
Traitors in Judiciary
& Police
Crimes by Khaki
FIRST Answer Judges Police
Cropping Up Of SC
Judge’s Name During Inquiry Is No Reason To Stall Probe Against Orissa HC Judge,
CJAR Writes To In-House Committee Chairman
Intellectual Dishonesty Is The Biggest Challenge To The Independence
Of Judiciary: Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/intellectual-dishonesty-biggest-challenge-independence-judiciary-senior-advocate-dushyant-dave-video / ,
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/intellectual-dishonesty-biggest-challenge-independence-judiciary-senior-advocate-dushyant-dave-video / ,
Why The kith And Kin Of Judges Being Mostly Considered For
Appointments? Asks SCBA President
Cell : 91 8970318202
Home page :
posted by DALIT online @ 1:32 AM
<< Home