SOS e - Clarion Of Dalit

IT IS A FORUM TOWARDS PROTECTING THE CIVIL , HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE OPPRESSED - DALITS , MINORITIES & TRIBALS.The Criminal - Police - Politician - Judge - Criminals Nexus is trying to silence me in many ways. If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA together with jurisdictional police & District Magistrate will be responsible for it.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Police Not Registering Complaint

S.O.S - e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web

Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed

Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R VOL.3 issue. 25 24 / 06 / 2009

Editorial : POLICE COMPLAINT AGAINST HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA & H.E.HONOURABLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA

In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are

equal , have right to equal oppurtunity & equitable justice

irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has

guaranteed these to every Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN

RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth.

However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC

SERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords ,

autocrats - unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL

FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public,

public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &

paymasters of this very same public servants.

In India , corruption has spread it's tentacles far &

wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last

resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there

corruption has spread.In present day India , if one

is rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean from

courts of law. there are corrupt police officials

who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up

different line of investigation , fix innocents ,

coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture ,

file B report closing the case , decides not to

appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the

list of millionnaire police officials who are

caught by karnataka lokayukta.

Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a

deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way

of presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooks

for a price , as observed in high profile

BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RK

ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates ,

together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is

left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest,

he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is

corrupt , people's last hope , democracy is dead. nowadays

we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.

our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST

LITIGATION before hon'ble supreme court of india,

but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ?

ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.

The issues raised by us for sample :

1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages ,

colas affecting the health of millions of indians

& public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous

products from india .

2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits ,

tribals , backward castes by government authorities

whereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings

by high & mighty people in total disregard to law.

in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying

court orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.

3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws ,

pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.

4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants

leaking india's defense secrets to foreign countries

& some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti

nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf

countries & elsewhere.

these type of appeals are for public good , national

security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of

india is not considering

our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider

even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts

even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good ,

inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints.

over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was

very low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible

for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me.

Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chief

justice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India

are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &

PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high & mighty criminals , anti

nationals ,

amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a

cognizable offence.

We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies ,

public servants , but it is an appeal to the

honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt

colleagues.

Hereby , i do once again appeal to the honourable chief

justice of india & H.E.Honourable president of india

to go through the following articles , to provide the requested

information in full , to order the subordinate public servants to

take appropriate action & to provide the requested information in full

and finally to accept this whole issue of news paper as a

PIL Appeal & to provide justice to the public. JAI HIND. VANDE

MATARAM.

Your's sincerely,

NAGARAJ.M.R.

Judgements for sale in Indian courts?

Recent events in Punjab & haryana high court proves that , corruption has

become rampant in Indian judidciary. Hereby we appeal to the honest few in

judiciary to stem this rot & to publicly answer the following questionnaire .

http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ , http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ , http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,

Punjab and Haryana High Court in another soup

Chandigarh, June 4 (IANS) A vigilance department report based on surveillance of

suspected extremists that unravelled a murky nexus between touts and judges has

landed the Punjab and Haryana High Court in another controversy. Following the

surveillance, investigators alleged that cases were being fixed.

But on Thursday, a day after the Punjab vigilance department report pointed out

taped evidence of corruption in the state's judicial system, top Punjab

government officials evaded the issue.

The vigilance department reports were prepared after state authorities allowed

tapping of two mobile phones of people linked to Sikh militants trying to

re-group in Punjab.

But what the tapping revealed was a deep malaise in the state's judicial system.

The reports clearly indicate the names of two sitting high court judges and

officers in the lower judiciary. These stated that touts were charging money for

fixing up cases in the high court and lower courts, manipulating listing of

cases and even affecting appointments of judges in lower courts.

Top Punjab government officials Thursday chose to avoid the controversy even as

the office of the Punjab governor issued a clarification saying that Governor

S.F. Rodrigues had not forwarded any communication to the prime minister's

office (PMO).

'No communication about the said report has ever been sent by the governor of

Punjab to the prime minister's office in New Delhi,' an official spokesman

clarified here.

Punjab government's media adviser Harcharan Bains said: 'I am out of station and

have not read the report. I will comment only after seeing it.'

Attempts to reach Chief Secretary Ramesh Inder Singh failed. His office staff,

after asking about the issue to be discussed, said that he was busy in meetings.

The reports, forwarded by top vigilance department officials to Punjab's

Advocate General H.S. Mattewal throughout 2008, have been sent to the Chief

Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for further

action, it was reported Thursday.

High court officials here refused to speak on the matter.

Controversies are nothing new to this high court.

The last one to rock it was the cash-for-judgement scam in which the names of

two women high court judges, Justices Nirmal Yadav and Nirmaljit Kaur, figured

after a packet containing Rs 1.5 mn (15 lakh) 'mistakenly' landed at the house

of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Aug last year.

The packet was purportedly meant for Justice Nirmal Yadav and the scam led to

the arrest of former Haryana additional advocate general Sanjeev Bansal and

others. The scam exposed the lawyer-judge-businessman nexus in the high court.

In the same high court 25 out of 27 judges went on protest mass casual leave - a

thing unprecedented and unheard of in Indian judiciary - April 19, 2004. The

protesting judges were against the then chief justice B.K. Roy summoning two of

them to seek an explanation about taking the membership of a controversial and

illegal golf club near here.

The golf club's case was pending before the high court when the two judges

became its members.

The virtual 'strike' by the judges created an uproar nationally in the judicial

community forcing the Chief Justice of India to summon the three topmost judges

of the high court and severely admonish them.

In June 2002, then high court chief justice Arun B. Saharya withdrew work from

three judges whose name figured in a recruitment scam in the Punjab Public

Service Commission (PPSC) and its chairman Ravinder Pal Sigh Sidhu.

While the children of two judges benefited with class-I government jobs in

Sidhu's cash-for-job scam, the third judge got several of his candidates

through.

While the PPSC scam controversy lingered, the judges, got their jobs back after

a while.

The case of V. Ramaswami, a former chief justice of this high court, reached

parliament for impeachment in 1993 after he was accused of financial

irregularities and misuse of official position during his tenure here.

However, the impeachment of Ramaswami, who became a Supreme Court judge after

his tenure here, did not take place due to divisions in parliament over the

issue.

Questions public servants are afraid to answer

The police , judges , public servants , etc question the accussed

persons , to ascertain the root cause of crime or dispute, to know the

truth behind every actions. The police even apply 3rd degree torture

on commoners ( although it is illegal ) to elicit truth , information

about crimes. When the same public wants to know the truth behind

crimes involving police , judges & public servants , and seeking truth

, answers , informations as per RTI ACT from police , judges & public

servants , they are not answering lest the truth come out. They are

citing one or the other technical reasons to hide information , to

hide truth about crimes , to shield the criminals. If any of the

following public servants truly stands for law , justice , truth , let

them answer for the following questions publicly through media

CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF

INDIA -

http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,

CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI

http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,

CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE

http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,

CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/

, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/

CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE

http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/

,

http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,

CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE

http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,

CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED

http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218

MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,

http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196

are you ready to catch tax thieves ?

http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,

http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196

MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS

http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,

http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196

reliance industry where is accountability ?

http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,

http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196

crimes at infosys campus

http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214

crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman

http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,

http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212

crimes of land mafia in India

http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,

http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212

currency thefts in RBI Press

http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,

http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80

killer colas & killer medicines of India

http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,

http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201

PUBLIC COMPLAINT TO HONOURABLE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE ,

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE

Respected sir,

I have made a complaint to your honourable self on 10/12/2004

regarding human rights & fundamental rights violations ,

at a press meet organized at PATRAKATARA BHAVANA , MYSORE. Till date

no action has been taken , when I asked your office

questions about human rights , fundamental rights violations ,

corruption & other crimes as per RTI ACT , they just gave

me half truths. Hereby I do once again request you to take appropriate

action on the above said complaint & to give me

full truthful information to my RTI application.. thanking you.

On-line complaint no : DARPG/E/2008/09467

Date :08.04.2009 Your's sincerely,

Place :Mysore Nagaraj.M.R.

POLICE COMPLAINT AGAINST HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA &

H.E.HONOURABLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA

From,

NAGARAJ.M.R.

LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE,

LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL,

MYSORE - 570017.

Through,

Honourable DG & IG of Police ,

State Police H.Q ,

Bangalore.

To,

Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,

Vijayanagar Police Station,

Mysore.

Honourable Sir,

Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS by

Honourable Chief Jusice of India &

H.E.Honourable President of India

In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are

equal , have right to equal oppurtunity &

equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the

constitution has guaranteed these to every indian

citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every

humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of

his / her birth.

However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC

SERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords ,

autocrats - unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL

FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public,

public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &

paymasters of this very same public servants.

In India , corruption has spread it's tentacles far &

wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last

resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there

corruption has spread.In present day India , if one

is rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean from

courts of law. there are corrupt police officials

who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up

different line of investigation , fix innocents ,

coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture ,

file B report closing the case , decides not to

appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the

list of millionnaire police officials who are

caught by karnataka lokayukta.

Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a

deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way

of presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooks

for a price , as observed in high profile

BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RK

ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates ,

together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is

left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest,

he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is

corrupt , people's last hope , democracy is dead. nowadays

we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.

our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST

LITIGATION before hon'ble supreme court of india,

but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ?

ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.

The issues raised by us for sample :

1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages ,

colas affecting the health of millions of indians

& public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous

products from india .

2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits ,

tribals , backward castes by government authorities

whereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings

by high & mighty people in total disregard to law.

in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying

court orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.

3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws ,

pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.

4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants

leaking india's defense secrets to foreign countries

& some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti

nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf

countries & elsewhere.

these type of appeals are for public good , national

security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of

india is not considering

our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider

even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts

even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good ,

inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints.

over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was

very low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible

for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me.

Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chief

justice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India

are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &

PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high & mighty criminals , anti

nationals ,

amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a

cognizable offence.

We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies ,

public servants , but it is an appeal to the

honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt

colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India & H.E.Honourable

President of India

have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional

duties , suppressed material truths / informations & thereby

repeatedly

violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & BASIC

HUMAN RIGHTS & Obstructing me from performing constitutionally

prescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA. Hereby , i do

request you to legally prosecute the above two public servants

on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper &

the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this

complaint.

thanking you.

your's sincerely,

nagaraj.m.r.

CAN JUDGEMENT BE MANIPULATED IN INDIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE ? - WHY NOT

PRISON SENTENCE FOR GUILTY SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES ?

New Delhi, August 21 The Delhi High Court imposed a four-month ban on

senior advocate R K Anand and colleague I U Khan on Thursday for

interfering with judicial proceedings in the high-profile BMW hit-and-

run case. A fine of Rs 2,000 was levied as well.

On May 30, 2007, television channel NDTV caught both lawyers in a

"sting" operation, conniving with key prosecution witness Suniel

Kulkarni to get main accused Sanjeev Nanda off the hook.

A High Court Bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and Manmohan

Sarin found the two guilty of criminal contempt.

"The entire material leaves a bitter taste in the mouth about the

goings-on in the BMW case. There is no manner of doubt whatsoever that

there was complicity between Mr Khan and Mr Anand... There can be

absolutely no doubt that Mr Khan and Mr Anand were, somehow or the

other, more than mixed up in the BMW case," observed the court, which

had taken suo motu cognizance of the expose the day after it was

aired.

"Mr Anand and Mr Khan are prohibited from appearing in this court

(Delhi High Court) or courts subordinate to it for four months from

today. However, they are free to discharge their professional duties

in terms of consultation, advice, conferences, opinions, etc," said

the Bench.

The court desisted from commenting on the conduct of Kulkarni, saying

it would not be "proper" to do so.

Though the verdict comes solely on basis of the CDs and transcripts of

the sting operation, the Bench said, "the unshakeable truth is that Mr

Anand is guilty of criminal contempt of court".

Contemplating a fit punishment, the Bench wondered how many in the

legal fraternity had had been taken by surprise to find Anand

indulging in such "sharp practices". "Mr Anand has held many

prestigious elective positions in the legal fraternity, including the

Bar Council of Delhi. He has also been a Member of the Rajya Sabha,"

noted the Bench.

The court said it knew Khan for his legal acumen and forensic skills —

"perhaps the reason why he was appointed Special Public Prosecutor in

the BMW case". High expectations over Khan fell apart when his conduct

"betrayed the trust that prosecution reposed in him... what he did was

perhaps beyond the realm of contemplation of the prosecuting agency".

Chastising the two for their misconduct, the Bench said: "We are not

dealing with a young lawyer who, driven by ambition and desire...

transgresses the limits or unwittingly or unknowingly commits criminal

contempt. We are dealing with senior advocates, who are expected to

conduct themselves as gentlemen and role models for younger members of

the Bar."

The court forwarded a recommendation that the two be "stripped of

their designations as senior advocates". The High Court Registrar

General will put up the court's recommendation before Chief Justice AP

Shah within a month.

In response to the verdict, the Delhi Bar Association president,

advocate Rajiv Khosla, said about 20,000 lawyers from district courts

were going on strike on August 22 in protest.

R K Anand

Began legal career in Delhi's Tis Hazari Court as a civil lawyer in

1967. Appointed government counsel in 1976. In 2000, JMM nominated him

to Rajya Sabha from Jharkhand. Appointed AICC observer for Assembly

polls in Himachal Pradesh in February 2003.

High-profile cases:

* In 1980, represented the late Indira Gandhi in a property litigation

filed by Maneka Gandhi after Sanjay Gandhi's death

* Narasimha Rao in the JMM bribery and the St Kitts case

* Chandraswami in the FERA violation case

* H K L Bhagat in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case

* Former external affairs minister Natwar Singh's son Jagat Singh in

the murder/suicide of his wife Natasha Singh

I U Khan

One of the top five criminal lawyers in Capital. He was charging a fee

of only Re 1 in the BMW case. Began his career in late 1960s, and came

intio spotlight in 1980s.

* Defended Sushil Sharma in the tandoor murder case, Subash Gupta in

the Personal Point triple murder, former Youth Congress President

Romesh Sharma in several cases and Tony Gill in Jessica Lall murder

case

When prosecution & defence lawyer together team up along with corrupt

police / public servants and manipulate evidences / records , the

court is helpless and will acquit the accussed for lack of evidences

eventhough the presiding judge is of impeccable integrity , honesty ,

he is help less. Add to this , if the presiding judge happens to be

corrupt & teams up with the criminal nexus , the result is

devastating , the rich criminal will get away & the innocent will

suffer punishment in some cases even death sentence.

Who will bell these few corrupt among the judiciary , bar , police &

public service ? why not prison sentence for two leading advocates

on criminal charges of contempt of court , destruction of evidences ?

are they above law ? why favouritism by court to the guilty in

awarding punishment to guilty two advocates as they happen to be

political influential ? will the court let a common man so leniently

for the same charges ? In the past cases dealt by these corrupt duo

advocates , there are possibilities that the same tactics of

manipulation of evidences , prosecution is done to win the cases , to

free the rich criminals , why not review of the cases dealt by these

corrupt advocates ?

The honest few among judiciary , bar , police & public service must

uphold our constitution , rule of law & bring to book their corrupt

colleagues.

AN APPEAL TO HONOURABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF MANIPUR INDIA

Dear Sir ,

INDIA: The officers who murdered Loitongbam Satish Singh and tortured Pebam Gunendro Singh in Manipur must be punished

Names of victims:

1. Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh, aged about 35 years, son of late Mr. Sharat Singh, Singjamei Oinam Thingel, Singjamei, Imphal west District, Manipur

2. Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh, aged 44 years, son of late P. Ibomcha Singh, Haobam Marak Keisham Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur

Name of alleged perpetrators:

Officers attached to the Assam Rifles stationed at Yaingangpokpi Camp, Manipur state (identifiable by the 1st victim named above)

Date of incident: From 16 May to 23 May 2009

Place of incident: Imphal, Manipur

I am writing to express concern about the case of Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh, about 35-years-old, son of late Mr. Sharat Singh, Singjamei Oinam Thingel, Singjamei, Imphal west District, Manipur and Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh, about 44-years-old, son of late P. Ibomcha Singh, Haobam Marak Keisham Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur.

I am informed that both Satish and Pebam were taken into custody by officers attached to the Assam Rifles, stationed at Yaingangpokpi Assam rifles camp in Manipur. I am aware that Satish and Pebam were taken into custody by the officers on mere suspicion. However I am gravely concerned by the details of detainment and torture both were subjected to while in custody, and appalled to discover that Satish was murdered in an allegedly fake encounter incident on 18 May. I am informed that by all probabilities, Satish was murdered by the officers, a fact borne out from the affidavit filed by Pebam at the office of the Additional Chief Secretary of Manipur state, which I have read.

I am informed that Pebam was seriously threatened by the Assam Rifles officers before his release and that a false case has since been registered against him; that the officers have threatened Pebam with death should he disclose the facts to anyone upon release. For this very reason, he has requested for immediate security from the state government.

I am also aware that this is not the first incident depicting the use of arbitrary force by the paramilitary officers stationed in Manipur; several civil society organisations inside and outside India and the United Nations have expressed concern about this to the government of India. I therefore request you to:

1. Ensure that a complete statement of Mr. Pebam Gunendro Singh is recorded by the local police;

2. Launch an immediate investigation into the entire incident;

3. Provide Pebam with security pending the entire process of investigation and the possible prosecution of the perpetrators;

4. Arrange interim compensation for the family of Mr. Loitongbam Satish Singh by the state.

Your's sincerely,

Nagaraj.M.R.

AN APPEAL TO HONOUARABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF MEGHALAYA INDIA

Dear Sir ,

INDIA: Police must guarantee the safety of human rights defender facing threats to life

Name of victim: Ms. Hasina Kharbhih, Team Leader, Impulse NGO Network, Ranee's Abode, near Horse Shoe Building, Lower Lachumiere, Shillong--793001, Meghalaya state

Name of alleged perpetrators:

1. Ms. Bethswa Dympep, accused in case number OC 9436337226 of Sardar Police Station, Shillong, Meghalaya

Date of incident: 27 May 2009

Place of incident: Shillong, Meghalaya

I am writing to express my concern about the threat to the life and security of Ms. Hasina Kharbhih, a noted human rights defender working against human trafficking. I am informed that Kharbhih has been contesting a criminal case against Ms. Bethswa Dympep at the local courts in Shillong and that since the beginning of the case Dympep has been threatening Kharbhih and her colleagues with personal harm and the closure of her office, demanding the withdrawal of the case from the court. However the police have not taken any action upon the complaint and have allowed Dympep to continue with her threats in private, and in the public eye.

I am informed that on May 27 in particular, Kharbhih was verbally abused and assaulted by Dympep in front of the local court, and has filed a complaint at the Lumbiengri Police Station. The police failed to arrest Dympep on the excuse that they could not locate her, yet I am informed that after the incident the assailant had convened a press conference at the local press club, a public event which the local police were aware of.

The lack of police action suggests that Dympep is using her influence to prevent the due process of law from taking its own course. In these circumstances, I request that you immediately take swift assertive action to ensure that Kharbhih remains safe throughout this trial and after, and that an investigation is ordered into the entire incident. I also request that if required, Dympep be taken into custody on the basis of the complaint filed by Kharbhih against her at Lumbiengri Police Station. Human rights defenders carry out a valuable and necessary service, often at the expense of their lives. Any government should give their safety utmost priority.

Yours sincerely,

Nagaraj.M.,R.

edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA cell :09341820313 home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit/ , http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ , e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com , naghrw@yahoo.com

Labels:

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home